Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32925344›Full record

Trial reportAnesthesia and analgesia2020

ADAPT-2: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Reduce Intraoperative EEG Suppression in Older Surgical Patients Undergoing Major Noncardiac Surgery.

Christopher J Tang, Zhongnan Jin, Laura P Sands, Devon Pleasants, Sanam Tabatabai, Yili Hong, Jacqueline M Leung

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06400706 (Effect of Electroencephalography), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06400706 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Electroencephalography (SEF and PSI) Guided General Anesthesia on Postoperative Delirium and Anesthetic Consumption in Children Underwent Dental Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAydin Adnan Menderes UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled92ConditionsPostoperative Delirium, Postoperative PainArmsEEG guided general anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher J TangFrom the Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Zhongnan JinCenter for Gerontology and Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Laura P SandsCenter for Gerontology and Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Devon PleasantsFrom the Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Sanam TabatabaiFrom the Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Yili HongCenter for Gerontology and Department of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Jacqueline M LeungFrom the Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

The role of genomics in postoperative delirium and sedationR01NR017622 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LEUNG, JACQUELINE M · 2019 to 2021
$2.6M
The Effects of Light vs Deep Anesthesia on Postoperative Cognitive OutcomesR21AG048456 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LEUNG, JACQUELINE M · 2015 to 2016
$444k
Acute preoperative sleep disruption and postoperative deliriumR21AG053715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LEUNG, JACQUELINE M · 2017 to 2018
$439k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG048456NIA NIH HHS R21 AG053715NINR NIH HHS R01 NR017622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent limited evidence suggests that the use of a processed electroencephalographic (EEG) monitor to guide anesthetic management may influence postoperative cognitive outcomes; however, the mechanism is unclear.

methodsThis exploratory, single-center, randomized clinical trial included patients who were ≥65 years of age undergoing elective noncardiac surgery. The study aimed to determine whether monitoring the brain using a processed EEG monitor reduced EEG suppression and subsequent postoperative delirium. The interventional group received processed EEG-guided anesthetic management to keep the Patient State Index (PSI) above 35 computed by the SEDline Brain Function Monitor (Masimo, Inc, Irvine, CA), while the standard care group was also monitored, but the EEG data were blinded from the clinicians. The primary outcome was intraoperative EEG suppression. A secondary outcome was incident postoperative delirium during the first 3 days after surgery.

resultsAll outcomes were analyzed using the intention-to-treat paradigm. Two hundred and four patients with a mean age of 72 ± 5 years were studied. Minutes of EEG suppression adjusted by the length of surgery was found to be less for the interventional group than the standard care group (median [interquartile range], 1.4% [5.0%] and 2.5% [10.4%]; Hodges-Lehmann estimated median difference [95% confidence interval {CI}] of -0.8% [-2.1 to -0.000009]). The effect of the intervention on EEG suppression differed for those with and without preoperative cognitive impairment (interaction P = .01), with the estimated incidence rate ratio (95% CI) of 0.39 (0.33-0.44) for those with preoperative cognitive impairment and 0.48 (0.44-0.51) for those without preoperative cognitive impairment. The incidence of delirium was not found to be different between the interventional (17%) and the standard care groups (20%), risk ratio = 0.85 (95% CI, 0.47-1.5).

conclusionsThe use of processed EEG to maintain the PSI >35 was associated with less time spent in intraoperative EEG suppression. Preoperative cognitive impairment was associated with a greater percent of surgical time spent in EEG suppression. A larger prospective cohort study to include more cognitively vulnerable patients is necessary to show whether an intervention to reduce EEG suppression is efficacious in reducing postoperative delirium.

Indexed as

Consciousness MonitorsElectroencephalographyAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesiaAnestheticsCognitive DysfunctionDeliriumEmergence DeliriumFemaleHumansIncidenceIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringMalePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesAnesthetics

Identifiers

PMID32925344
PMCPMC7599075
OpenAlexW3011099835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.