Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32925322›Full record

ReviewAnesthesia and analgesia2020

Case Studies Using the Electroencephalogram to Monitor Anesthesia-Induced Brain States in Children.

Steven P Brandt, Elisa C Walsh, Laura Cornelissen, Johanna M Lee, Charles Berde, Erik S Shank, Patrick L Purdon

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Steven P BrandtFrom the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elisa C WalshFrom the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Laura CornelissenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Johanna M LeeFrom the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Charles BerdeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Erik S ShankFrom the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Patrick L PurdonFrom the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USBoston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For this child, at this particular moment, how much anesthesia should I give? Determining the drug requirements of a specific patient is a fundamental problem in medicine. Our current approach uses population-based pharmacological models to establish dosing. However, individual patients, and children in particular, may respond to drugs differently. In anesthesiology, we have the advantage that we can monitor our patients in real time and titrate drugs to the desired effect. Examples include blood pressure management or muscle relaxation. Although the brain is the primary site of action for sedative-hypnotic drugs, the brain is not routinely monitored during general anesthesia or sedation, a fact that would surprise many patients. One reason for this is that, until recently, physiologically principled approaches for anesthetic brain monitoring have not been articulated. In the past few years, our knowledge of anesthetic brain mechanisms has developed rapidly. We now know that anesthetic drug effects are clearly visible in the electroencephalogram (EEG) of adults and reflect underlying anesthetic pharmacology and brain mechanisms. Most recently, similar effects have been characterized in children. In this article, we describe how EEG monitoring could be used to guide anesthetic management in pediatric patients. We review previous evidence and present multiple case studies showing how drug-specific and dose-dependent EEG signatures seen in adults are visible in children and infants, including those with neurological disorders. We propose that the EEG can be used in the anesthetic care of children to enable anesthesiologists to better assess the drug requirements of individual patients in real time and improve patient safety and experience.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaChildChild, PreschoolElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringMalePatient SafetyPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID32925322
PMCPMC7467151
OpenAlexW3080201065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.