Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32925256›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of anaesthesiology2021

Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular vs. retroclavicular block of the brachial plexus: comparison of ipsilateral diaphragmatic function: A randomised clinical trial.

Paige L Georgiadis, Kamen V Vlassakov, Megan E Patton, Philipp B Lirk, David R Janfaza, Jose L Zeballos, Aurora N Quaye, Vijay Patel, Kristin L Schreiber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of anaesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02631122 (Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block vs Retroclavicular Brachial Plexus Block), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02631122 nacompletednot on this map

Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block vs Retroclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Comparison of Impact on Ipsilateral Diaphragmatic Function

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2017 to 2019Enrolled44ConditionsPhrenic Nerve ParalysisArmsSupraclavicular vs Retroclavicular Nerve Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paige L Georgiadis
Kamen V Vlassakov
Megan E Patton
Philipp B Lirk
David R Janfaza
Jose L Zeballos
Aurora N Quaye
Vijay Patel
Kristin L Schreiber
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USUniversity of Vermont Medical Center · US

Funding

Personalizing Perioperative Preventive Analgesia: Translational Studies Investigating the Biopsychosocial Underpinnings of Enhanced Pain PropensityR35GM128691 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KRISTIN SCHREIBER · 2018 to 2026
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ultrasound-guided retroclavicular block (RCB) is a recently described alternative approach to brachial plexus blockade at the level of the cords. Although more distal blockade of the brachial plexus is thought to be associated with a lower incidence of phrenic nerve block, the impact of RCB on ipsilateral diaphragmatic function has not been formally investigated.

objectiveTo compare the effects of supraclavicular and retroclavicular brachial plexus block on diaphragmatic function.

settingA single tertiary hospital, study period from December 2017 to May 2019.

designDouble-blinded, randomised study. PATIENTS: A total of 40 patients undergoing upper extremity surgery below the axilla. Exclusion criteria included significant pulmonary disease, BMI more than 40 and contra-indication to peripheral nerve block.

interventionsPatients were randomised to supraclavicular or retroclavicular brachial plexus block with ropivacaine 0.5%. OUTCOME MEASURES: Phrenic block was assessed by measuring changes in diaphragmatic excursion using M-mode ultrasound, and maximum inspiratory volume on incentive spirometry from baseline, at 15 and 30 min postblock, and postoperatively. Comparative assessment of block characteristics included timing and distribution of sensory and motor block onset in the upper extremity, and scanning and block performance times.

resultsThe incidence of phrenic block in the supraclavicular group was higher by ultrasound imaging (70 vs. 15%) and also by pulmonary function testing (55 vs. 5%), with both diaphragmatic excursion and maximum inspiratory volume decreasing to a greater extent after supraclavicular block (SCB) compared with RCB at 15, 30 min and postoperative time points (repeated measures analysis of variance, P < 0.001). There was no difference in timing and extent of distal arm block, but suprascapular and axillary nerves were more consistently blocked after SCB than after RCB.

conclusionThe current study confirms the hypothesis that a RCB is significantly less likely to affect ipsilateral diaphragmatic function than a SCB.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02631122.

Indexed as

Brachial PlexusBrachial Plexus BlockAnesthetics, LocalHumansUltrasonographyUltrasonography, InterventionalAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

PMID32925256
PMCPMC8324046
OpenAlexW3085096078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.