Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32925110›Full record

ReviewJournal of Parkinson's disease2020

Personalized Care Management for Persons with Parkinson's Disease.

Angelika D van Halteren, Marten Munneke, Eva Smit, Sue Thomas, Bastiaan R Bloem, Sirwan K L Darweesh

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Prognostic factors of survival in corticobasal syndrome and corticobasal degeneration: A scoping review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Angelika D van HalterenDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marten MunnekeDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Eva SmitRadboud University Medical Center, Adviesbureau Procesverbetering en Implementatie, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sue ThomasParkinson's Academy Faculty, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Bastiaan R BloemDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sirwan K L DarweeshDepartment of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLParkinson's UK · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing awareness that delivery of integrated and personalized care is necessary to meet the needs of persons living with Parkinson's disease. In other chronic diseases than Parkinson's disease, care management models have been deployed to deliver integrated and personalized care, yielding positive effects on patients' health outcomes, quality of life and health care utilization. However, care management models have been highly heterogeneous, as there is currently no clear operationalization of its core elements. In addition, most care management models are disease-specific and not tailored to the individual needs and preferences of a patient. In this viewpoint we present an integrated and personalized care management model for persons with Parkinson's disease costing of five core elements: (1) care coordination, (2) patient navigation, (3) information provision, (4) early detection of signs and symptoms through proactive monitoring and (5) process monitoring. Following the description of each core element, implications for implementing the model into practice are discussed. Finally, we provide clinical and methodological considerations on the evaluation of care management models.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementPatient Acceptance of Health CareDelivery of Health CareHumansParkinson DiseasePatient NavigationPrecision MedicineQuality of Lifedelivery of integrated healthcaredisease managementParkinson’s diseasepatient care teampatient navigation

Identifiers

PMID32925110
PMCPMC7592650
OpenAlexW3085775582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.