Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32924952›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2020

Protocol Development for HMU! (HIV Prevention for Methamphetamine Users), a Study of Peer Navigation and Text Messaging to Promote Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Adherence and Persistence Among People Who Use Methamphetamine: Qualitative Focus Group and Interview Study.

Vanessa M McMahan, Noah Frank, Smitty Buckler, Lauren R Violette, Jared M Baeten, Caleb J Banta-Green, Ruanne V Barnabas, Jane Simoni, Joanne D Stekler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03584282 (Interventions to Improve the HIV PrEP Cascade Among Methamphetamine Users), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03584282 nacompletednot on this map

Interventions to Improve the HIV PrEP Cascade Among Methamphetamine Users

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2018 to 2022Enrolled21ConditionsHIV/AIDS, Adherence, Medication, Drug UseArmsText Messaging, Peer Navigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa M McMahanSan Francisco Department of Public Health, Center on Substance Use and Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2331-7206
Noah FrankSan Francisco Department of Public Health, Center on Substance Use and Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4418-2753
Smitty BucklerSan Francisco Department of Public Health, Center on Substance Use and Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1909-9023
Lauren R VioletteSan Francisco Department of Public Health, Center on Substance Use and Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6469-7298
Jared M BaetenSan Francisco Department of Public Health, Center on Substance Use and Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8242-8438
Caleb J Banta-GreenDepartment of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4084-6943
Ruanne V BarnabasDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1793-6003
Jane SimoniDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8711-1576
Joanne D SteklerSan Francisco Department of Public Health, Center on Substance Use and Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8064-3011
University of Washington · USSan Francisco Department of Public Health · US

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Interventions to Improve the HIV PrEP Cascade among Methamphetamine UsersR34DA045620 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEKLER, JOANNE DONNA · 2017 to 2019
$699k
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA045620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people (TGP) who use methamphetamine are disproportionately impacted by HIV acquisition. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective at preventing HIV, and interventions that support PrEP persistence and adherence should be evaluated among MSM and TGP who use methamphetamine.

objectiveWe conducted formative work to inform the development of text messaging and peer navigation interventions to support PrEP persistence and adherence among MSM and TGP who use methamphetamine. In this paper, we describe how the findings from these focus groups and interviews were used to refine the study interventions and protocol for the Hit Me Up! study (HMU!; HIV Prevention in Methamphetamine Users).

methodsBetween October 2017 and March 2018, we conducted two focus groups and three in-depth interviews with MSM and TGP who use methamphetamine or who have worked with people who use methamphetamine. During these formative activities, we asked participants about their opinions on the proposed interventions, education and recruitment materials, and study design. We focused on how we could develop peer navigation and text messaging interventions that would be culturally appropriate and acceptable to MSM and TGP who use methamphetamine. Transcripts were reviewed by two authors who performed a retrospective content analysis to describe which specific opinions and recommendations influenced protocol development and the refinement of the interventions.

resultsOverall, participants thought that MSM and TGP would be interested in participating in the study, although they expected recruitment and retention to be challenging. Participants thought that the peer navigator should be someone who is nonjudgmental, has experience with people who use methamphetamine, and is patient and flexible. There was consensus that three text messages per day were appropriate, adherence reminders should be straightforward, all messages should be nonjudgmental, and participants should be able to tailor the timing and content of the text messages. These suggestions were incorporated into the study interventions via the hiring and training process and into the development of the text library, platform selection, and customizability of messages.

conclusionsIt is important to include the opinions and insights of populations most impacted by HIV to develop PrEP interventions with the greatest chance of success. Our formative work generated several recommendations that were incorporated into the interventions and protocol development for our ongoing study.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03584282; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03584282.

Indexed as

men who have sex with menmethamphetaminepeer navigationpre-exposure prophylaxistext messagingtransgender people

Identifiers

PMID32924952
PMCPMC7522731
OpenAlexW3084906565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.