Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32924946›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Association of Social Network Use With Increased Anxiety Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Emergency Medicine Teams: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey Study.

Thomas Clavier, Benjamin Popoff, Jean Selim, Marion Beuzelin, Melanie Roussel, Vincent Compere, Benoit Veber, Emmanuel Besnier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. A One-Year Prospective Study of Work-Related Mental Health in the Intensivists of a COVID-19 Hub Hospital.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas ClavierDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8630-7537
Benjamin PopoffDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2854-0909
Jean SelimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1395-1601
Marion BeuzelinDepartment of Critical Care, Dieppe General Hospital, Dieppe, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5229-8927
Melanie RousselDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2467-8484
Vincent CompereDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5977-7090
Benoit VeberDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5938-7284
Emmanuel BesnierDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0267-0986
Université de Rouen Normandie · FRCentre Médical de La Teppe · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical care teams are on the front line of managing the COVID-19 pandemic, which is stressful for members of these teams.

objectiveOur objective was to assess whether the use of social networks is associated with increased anxiety related to the COVID-19 pandemic among members of critical care teams.

methodsWe distributed a web-based survey to physicians, residents, registered and auxiliary nurses, and nurse anesthetists providing critical care (anesthesiology, intensive care, or emergency medicine) in several French hospitals. The survey evaluated the respondents' use of social networks, their sources of information on COVID-19, and their levels of anxiety and information regarding COVID-19 on analog scales from 0 to 10.

resultsWe included 641 respondents in the final analysis; 553 (86.3%) used social networks, spending a median time of 60 minutes (IQR 30-90) per day on these networks. COVID-19-related anxiety was higher in social network users than in health care workers who did not use these networks (median 6, IQR 5-8 vs median 5, IQR 3-7) in univariate (P=.02) and multivariate (P<.001) analyses, with an average anxiety increase of 10% in social network users. Anxiety was higher among health care workers using social networks to obtain information on COVID-19 than among those using other sources (median 6, IQR 5-8 vs median 6, IQR 4-7; P=.04). Social network users considered that they were less informed about COVID-19 than those who did not use social networks (median 8, IQR 7-9 vs median 7, IQR 6-8; P<.01).

conclusionsOur results suggest that social networks contribute to increased anxiety in critical care teams. To protect their mental health, critical care professionals should consider limiting their use of these networks during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

PandemicsSocial NetworkingAdultAnesthesiologyAnxietyCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Critical CareCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency MedicineFemaleFranceHealth PersonnelHumansInternetMaleanxietycoronavirus disease 2019COVID-19emergency medicine, anesthesiology, critical care medicinemental healthnursephysiciansocial network

Identifiers

PMID32924946
PMCPMC7518883
OpenAlexW3085548707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.