Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32924520›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2021

The role of working memory capacity in spatial learning depends on spatial information integration difficulty in the environment.

Qiliang He, Andrew T Han, Tanya A Churaman, Thackery I Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qiliang HeSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology.ORCID 0000-0001-7410-6367
Andrew T HanChuraman, School of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Tanya A ChuramanChuraman, School of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Thackery I BrownSchool of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology.ORCID 0000-0001-8586-3099

Funding

Neurobiological mechanisms of aging and stress on prospective navigationR21AG063131 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BROWN, THACKERY IAN · 2019 to 2020
$426k
National Institutes of Health; National Institute on AgingNIA NIH HHS R21 AG063131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A substantial amount of research has been conducted to uncover factors underlying the pronounced individual differences in spatial navigation. Spatial working memory capacity (SWM) is shown to be one important factor. In other domains such as reading comprehension, the role of working memory capacity in task performance differences depends on the difficulty of other task demands. In the current study, we investigated whether, similarly, the relationship between SWM and spatial performance was dependent on the difficulty of spatial information integration in the environment. Based on our prior work, spatial information integration difficulty depends on (a) difficulty in observing spatial relationships between locations of interest in the environment and (b) the individual's ability to integrate such relationships. Leveraging virtual reality, we manipulated the difficulty in observing the spatial relationships during learning by changing the visibility of the buildings, and measured individual's self-report sense of direction (SOD) which modulates the ability to integrate such relationships under different degrees of visibility. We consistently found that in the "easy" spatial integration condition (high SOD with high visibility), high SWM did not significantly improve spatial learning. The same pattern was observed in the difficult condition (low SOD with low visibility). On the other hand, high SWM improved spatial learning for medium difficulty (high SOD with low visibility, or vice versa). Together, our results reveal that the role of SWM in spatial learning differences depends on spatial integration difficulty. Our results also have significant applied implications for using virtual reality to target and facilitate spatial learning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

IndividualityMemory, Short-TermSpatial LearningSpatial MemorySpatial NavigationVirtual RealityHumansYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32924520
PMCPMC7956123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.