ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2020
Bioinspired Suprahelical Frameworks as Scaffolds for Artificial Photosynthesis.
Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- To Biotic or Abiotic: Biohybrid Systems for Artificial Photosynthesis.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Research trends of piezoelectric materials in neurodegenerative disease applications.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Framework materials have shown promising potential in various biological applications. However, the state-of-the-art components show low biocompatibility or mechanical instability, or cannot integrate both optics and electronics, thus severely limiting their extensive applications in biological systems. Herein, we demonstrate that amide-based bioorganic building blocks, including dipeptides and dipeptide nucleic acids, can self-assemble into hydrogen-bonded suprahelix architectures of controllable handedness, which then form suprahelical frameworks with diverse cavities. Especially, the cavities can be tuned to be hydrophilic or hydrophobic, and the shortest diagonal distance can be modulated from 0.5 to 1.8 nm, with the volume proportion in the unit cell changing from 5 to 60%. Furthermore, the hydrogen bonding networks result in high mechanical rigidity and semiconductively optoelectronic properties, which allow the utilization of the suprahelical frameworks as supramolecular scaffolds for artificial photosynthesis. Our findings reveal amide-based suprahelix architectures acting as bioinspired supramolecular frameworks, thus extending the constituents portfolio and increasing the feasibility of using framework materials for biological applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.