Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923997›Full record

ReviewTrends in chemistry2020

The Structure and Function of DNA G-Quadruplexes.

Jochen Spiegel, Santosh Adhikari, Shankar Balasubramanian

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 413 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
413citing papers in PubMed
31.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

413 citing papers in PubMed, 886 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Folding and unfolding dynamics of a DNA aptamer studied by heteronuclearJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. KRSC advances · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

353 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jochen SpiegelCancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
Santosh AdhikariDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.
Shankar BalasubramanianCancer Research UK, Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBCancer Research UK · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 18618Wellcome Trust 209441/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guanine-rich DNA sequences can fold into four-stranded, noncanonical secondary structures called G-quadruplexes (G4s). G4s were initially considered a structural curiosity, but recent evidence suggests their involvement in key genome functions such as transcription, replication, genome stability, and epigenetic regulation, together with numerous connections to cancer biology. Collectively, these advances have stimulated research probing G4 mechanisms and consequent opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Here, we provide a perspective on the structure and function of G4s with an emphasis on key molecules and methodological advances that enable the study of G4 structures in human cells. We also critically examine recent mechanistic insights into G4 biology and protein interaction partners and highlight opportunities for drug discovery.

Indexed as

DNAdrug discoveryG4G-quadruplexnucleic acidssecondary structure

Identifiers

PMID32923997
PMCPMC7472594
OpenAlexW2966334511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.