ArticleTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology
Stepwise segmentation error correction in optical coherence tomography angiography images of patients with diabetic macular edema.
Article in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Image Artifacts on Quantitation of Vessel Density and Perfusion.Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina · 2026Article
- Editorial: Applications of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in ocular complications of diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Chorioretinal microvascular changes in slow flow coronary phenomenon: a multi-center study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effect of manual OCTA segmentation correction to improve image quality and visibility of choroidal neovascularization in AMD.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effect of mydriasis on macular and peripapillary metrics in swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Application of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in True and Pseudo-Optic Disc Swelling.Journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Quantitative Parameters Relevant for Diabetic Macular Edema Evaluation by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Sleeve gastrectomy improved microvascular phenotypes from obesity cohort, detected with optical coherence tomography angiography.Journal of diabetes · 2023Article
- Microvascular Changes After Conbercept Intravitreal Injection of PDR With or Without Center-Involved Diabetic Macular Edema Analyzed by OCTA.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Differentiating features of OCT angiography in diabetic macular edema.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Artifacts in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchReview
- Segmentation Error Correction of the Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Images in Peer-Reviewed Studies.Journal of current ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo determine the minimum number of optical coherence tomography B-scan corrections required to provide acceptable vessel density measurements on optical coherence tomography angiography images in eyes with diabetic macular edema.
methodsIn this prospective, noninterventional case series, the optical coherence tomography angiography images of eyes with center-involving diabetic macular edema were assessed. Optical coherence tomography angiography imaging was performed using RTVue Avanti spectral-domain optical coherence tomography system with the AngioVue software (V.2017.1.0.151; Optovue, Fremont, CA, USA). Segmentation error was recorded and manually corrected in the inner retinal layers in the central foveal, 100th and 200th optical coherence tomography B-scans. The segmentation error correction was then continued until all optical coherence tomography B-scans in whole en face image were corrected. At each step, the manual correction of each optical coherence tomography B-scan was propagated to whole image. The vessel density and retinal thickness were recorded at baseline and after each optical coherence tomography B-scan correction.
resultsA total of 36 eyes of 26 patients were included. To achieve full segmentation error correction in whole en face image, an average of 1.72 ± 1.81 and 5.57 ± 3.87 B-scans was corrected in inner plexiform layer and outer plexiform layer, respectively. The change in the vessel density measurements after complete segmentation error correction was statistically significant after inner plexiform layer correction. However, no statistically significant change in vessel density was found after manual correction of the outer plexiform layer. The vessel density measurements were statistically significantly different after single central foveal B-scan correction of inner plexiform layer compared with the baseline measurements (
conclusionMultiple optical coherence tomography B-scans should be manually corrected to address segmentation error in whole images of en face optical coherence tomography angiography in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Correction of central foveal B-scan provides the most significant change in vessel density measurements in eyes with diabetic macular edema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.