Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923912›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2020

Subsequent Neoplasm Risk Associated With Rare Variants in DNA Damage Response and Clinical Radiation Sensitivity Syndrome Genes in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Lindsay M Morton, Danielle M Karyadi, Stephen W Hartley, Megan N Frone, Joshua N Sampson, Rebecca M Howell, Joseph P Neglia, Michael A Arnold, Belynda D Hicks, Kristine Jones and 18 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Update on Recommendations for Cancer Screening and Surveillance in Children with Genomic Instability Disorders.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsay M MortonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Danielle M KaryadiDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Stephen W HartleyDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Megan N FroneDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Joshua N SampsonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Rebecca M HowellDepartment of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Joseph P NegliaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Michael A ArnoldDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Belynda D HicksDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Kristine JonesDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Bin ZhuDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Casey L DagnallDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Eric KarlinsDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Meredith S YeagerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Wendy M LeisenringCancer Prevention and Clinical Statistics Programs, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Yutaka YasuiDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Lucie M TurcotteDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Susan A SmithDepartment of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Rita E WeathersDepartment of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Jeremy MillerInformation Management Services, Calverton, MD.
Byron S SigelDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Diana M MerinoDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Amy Berrington de GonzalezDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Smita BhatiaInstitute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Leslie L RobisonDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Margaret A TuckerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Gregory T ArmstrongDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Stephen J ChanockDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
National Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USLeidos (United States) · USUniversity of Minnesota · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USInformation Management Services · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI Michael A Dyer · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Mach-LETSGO: Machine-LEarning of Treatment, Survey, and Genetics towards Obtaining Correct Classification of Chronic Conditions in Adult Survivors in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study - CCSS SupplU24CA055727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Gregory Armstrong · 1999 to 2026
$96.7M
Treatment Modifications, Outcomes and Provider Decision Making in the Management of Subsequent Breast Cancers Among Survivors of Childhood CancerK08CA234232 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI TURCOTTE, LUCIE MARIE · 2018 to 2021
$714k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA234232NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS U24 CA055727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadiotherapy for childhood cancer is associated with elevated subsequent neoplasm (SN) risk, but the contribution of rare variants in DNA damage response and radiation sensitivity genes to SN risk is unknown. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted whole-exome sequencing in a cohort of childhood cancer survivors originally diagnosed during 1970 to 1986 (mean follow-up, 32.7 years), with reconstruction of doses to body regions from radiotherapy records. We identified patients who developed SN types previously reported to be related to radiotherapy (RT-SNs; eg, basal cell carcinoma [BCC], breast cancer, meningioma, thyroid cancer, sarcoma) and matched controls (sex, childhood cancer type/diagnosis, age, SN location, radiation dose, survival). Conditional logistic regression assessed SN risk associated with potentially protein-damaging rare variants (SnpEff, ClinVar) in 476 DNA damage response or radiation sensitivity genes with exact permutation-based

resultsAmong 5,105 childhood cancer survivors of European descent, 1,108 (21.7%) developed at least 1 RT-SN. Out-of-field RT-SN risk, excluding BCC, was associated with homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene variants (patient cases, 23.2%; controls, 10.8%; odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% CI, 1.7 to 3.9;

conclusionIn this large-scale discovery study, we identified novel associations between RT-SN risk after childhood cancer and potentially protein-damaging rare variants in genes involved in DNA double-strand break repair, particularly HRR. With replication, these results could affect screening recommendations for childhood cancer survivors and risk-benefit assessments of treatment approaches.

Identifiers

PMID32923912
PMCPMC7469586
OpenAlexW3081325588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.