Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923905›Full record

ReviewJCO precision oncology2020

Next-Generation Sequencing of Advanced GI Tumors Reveals Individual Treatment Options.

Michael Bitzer, Leonie Ostermann, Marius Horger, Saskia Biskup, Martin Schulze, Kristina Ruhm, Franz Hilke, Öznur Öner, Konstantin Nikolaou, Christopher Schroeder and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JCO precision oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Case Report: FGFR2 inhibitor resistance viaFrontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Lessons learned: the first consecutive 1000 patients of the CCCMunichJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. [The molecular tumor board].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael BitzerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Leonie OstermannDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Marius HorgerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Saskia BiskupCeGaT GmbH and Praxis für Humangenetik, Tuebingen, Germany.
Martin SchulzeCeGaT GmbH and Praxis für Humangenetik, Tuebingen, Germany.
Kristina RuhmCenter for Personalized Medicine, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Franz HilkeInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Öznur ÖnerCenter for Personalized Medicine, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Konstantin NikolaouCluster of Excellence, Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Christopher SchroederInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Olaf RiessInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Falko FendInstitute of Pathology and Neuropathology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Daniel ZipsGerman Cancer Research Consortium, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martina HinterleitnerDepartment of Internal Medicine VIII, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Lars ZenderCluster of Excellence, Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Ghazaleh TabatabaiCluster of Excellence, Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Janina BehaCenter for Personalized Medicine, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Nisar P MalekDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Eberhard-Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEHeidelberg University · DEPraxis für Humangenetik Tübingen · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrecision oncology connects highly complex diagnostic procedures with patient histories to identify individualized treatment options in interdisciplinary molecular tumor boards (MTBs). Detailed data on MTB-guided treatments and outcome with a focus on advanced GI cancers have not been reported yet. PATIENTS AND

methodsNext-generation sequencing of tumor and normal tissue pairs was performed between April 2016 and February 2018. After identification of relevant molecular alterations, available clinical studies or in-label, off-label, or matched experimental treatment options were recommended. Follow-up data and a response assessment that was based on radiologic imaging were recorded.

resultsNinety-six patients were presented to the MTB of Tuebingen University Hospital. Sixteen (17%) showed "pathogenic" or "likely pathogenic" germline variants. Recommendations on the basis of molecular alterations or tumor mutational burden were given for 41 patients (43%). Twenty-five received the suggested drug, and 20 were evaluable for best response assessment. Three patients (15%) reached a partial response (PR), and 6 (30%), stable disease (SD), whereas 11 (55%) had tumor progression (progressive disease). Median progression-free survival (PFS) for all treated and evaluable patients was 2.8 months (range, 1.0-9.0 months), and median overall survival (OS) of all treated patients was 5.2 months (range, 0.1 months to not reached). Patients with SD for ≥ 3 months or PR compared with progressive disease showed both a statistically significant longer median PFS (7.8 months [95% CI, 4.2 to 11.4 months]

conclusionNext-generation sequencing diagnostics of advanced GI cancers identified a substantial number of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants and unique individual treatment options. Patients with PR or SD in the course of MTB-recommended treatments seemed to benefit with respect to PFS and OS.

Identifiers

PMID32923905
PMCPMC7446530
OpenAlexW3014558303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.