ReviewJCO precision oncology2020
Next-Generation Sequencing of Advanced GI Tumors Reveals Individual Treatment Options.
Review in JCO precision oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Tumor Boards clinical impact on patient care and structural features: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Personalized signaling pathway analysis of gastrointestinal tumors for patient stratification and drug target evaluation using clinically derived core biopsies.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of molecular tumor board data on clinical effectiveness and evaluation gaps.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Case Report: FGFR2 inhibitor resistance viaFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The molecular interaction pattern of lenvatinib enables inhibition of wild-type or kinase-mutated FGFR2-driven cholangiocarcinoma.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Lessons learned: the first consecutive 1000 patients of the CCCMunichJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Article
- Modern developments in germline pharmacogenomics for oncology prescribing.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2022Review
- Clinically actionable genotypes for anticancer prescribing among >1500 patients with pharmacogenomic testing.Cancer · 2022Article
- Challenges in precision medicine in pancreatic cancer: A focus in cancer stem cells and microbiota.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Detection of mobile elements insertions for routine clinical diagnostics in targeted sequencing data.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2021Article
- [The molecular tumor board].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Review
- Clinical Outcomes of Genotype-Matched Therapy for Recurrent Gynecological Cancers: A Single Institutional Experience.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Targeting extracellular and juxtamembrane FGFR2 mutations in chemotherapy-refractory cholangiocarcinoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2021Article
- The Community Oncology and Academic Medical Center Alliance in the Age of Precision Medicine: Cancer Genetics and Genomics Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrecision oncology connects highly complex diagnostic procedures with patient histories to identify individualized treatment options in interdisciplinary molecular tumor boards (MTBs). Detailed data on MTB-guided treatments and outcome with a focus on advanced GI cancers have not been reported yet. PATIENTS AND
methodsNext-generation sequencing of tumor and normal tissue pairs was performed between April 2016 and February 2018. After identification of relevant molecular alterations, available clinical studies or in-label, off-label, or matched experimental treatment options were recommended. Follow-up data and a response assessment that was based on radiologic imaging were recorded.
resultsNinety-six patients were presented to the MTB of Tuebingen University Hospital. Sixteen (17%) showed "pathogenic" or "likely pathogenic" germline variants. Recommendations on the basis of molecular alterations or tumor mutational burden were given for 41 patients (43%). Twenty-five received the suggested drug, and 20 were evaluable for best response assessment. Three patients (15%) reached a partial response (PR), and 6 (30%), stable disease (SD), whereas 11 (55%) had tumor progression (progressive disease). Median progression-free survival (PFS) for all treated and evaluable patients was 2.8 months (range, 1.0-9.0 months), and median overall survival (OS) of all treated patients was 5.2 months (range, 0.1 months to not reached). Patients with SD for ≥ 3 months or PR compared with progressive disease showed both a statistically significant longer median PFS (7.8 months [95% CI, 4.2 to 11.4 months]
conclusionNext-generation sequencing diagnostics of advanced GI cancers identified a substantial number of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants and unique individual treatment options. Patients with PR or SD in the course of MTB-recommended treatments seemed to benefit with respect to PFS and OS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.