Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923897›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2020

Immunological Differences Between Immune-Rich Estrogen Receptor-Positive and Immune-Rich Triple-Negative Breast Cancers.

Tess O'Meara, Michal Marczyk, Tao Qing, Vesal Yaghoobi, Kim Blenman, Kimberly Cole, Vasiliki Pelekanou, David L Rimm, Lajos Pusztai

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The immunology of human breast cancer.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tess O'MearaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Michal MarczykDepartment of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Tao QingDepartment of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Vesal YaghoobiDepartment of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Kim BlenmanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Kimberly ColeDepartment of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Vasiliki PelekanouDepartment of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
David L RimmDepartment of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Lajos PusztaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Yale University · USSanofi (United States) · USSilesian University of Technology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA subset of estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) breast cancer (BC) contains high levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), similar to triple-negative BC (TNBC). The majority of immuno-oncology trials target TNBCs because of the greater proportion of TIL-rich TNBCs. The extent to which the immune microenvironments of immune-rich ER-positive BC and TNBC differ is unknown. PATIENTS AND

methodsRNA sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; n = 697 ER-positive BCs; n = 191 TNBCs) were used for discovery; microarray expression data from Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC; n = 1,186 ER-positive BCs; n = 297 TNBCs) was used for validation. Patients in the top 25th percentile of a previously published total TIL metagene score distribution were considered immune rich. We compared expression of immune cell markers, immune function metagenes, and immuno-oncology therapeutic targets among immune-rich subtypes.

resultsRelative fractions of resting mast cells (TCGA

conclusionDifferent immunotherapy strategies may be optimal in immune-rich ER-positive BC and TNBC. Drugs targeting the TGF-β pathway and M2-like macrophages are promising strategies in immune-rich ER-positive BCs to augment antitumor immunity.

Identifiers

PMID32923897
PMCPMC7446500
OpenAlexW3037713110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.