Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923889›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2020

Response of Brain Metastases From

Felipe Batalini, Stacy L Moulder, Eric P Winer, Hope S Rugo, Nancy U Lin, Gerburg M Wulf

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Lipophagy and lipid droplets in neurodegeneration.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Update on the Management of Brain Metastasis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  18. Leptomeningeal Metastases: New Opportunities in the Modern Era.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. JCO precision oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Felipe BataliniBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Stacy L MoulderMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Eric P WinerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Hope S RugoUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Nancy U LinDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Gerburg M WulfBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Funding

Optimization of PI3K-inhibitors to augment the efficacy of microtubule-disrupting chemotherapyR01CA226776 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI WULF, GERBURG M · 2018 to 2022
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID32923889
PMCPMC7446424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.