Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923868›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2019

Identification of Actionable Genomic Alterations Using Circulating Cell-Free DNA.

Nora S Sánchez, Michael P Kahle, Ann Marie Bailey, Chetna Wathoo, Kavitha Balaji, Mehmet Esat Demirhan, Dong Yang, Milind Javle, Ahmed Kaseb, Cathy Eng and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Use of on-therapy ctDNA monitoring in a patient withTranslational lung cancer research · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nora S SánchezThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Michael P KahleThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ann Marie BaileyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Chetna WathooThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Kavitha BalajiThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Mehmet Esat DemirhanThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Dong YangThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Milind JavleThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Ahmed KasebThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Cathy EngThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Vivek SubbiahThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Filip JankuThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Victoria M RaymondGuardant Health, Redwood City, CA.
Richard B LanmanGuardant Health, Redwood City, CA.
Kenna R Mills ShawThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Funda Meric-BernstamThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USGuardant (United States) · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCell-free DNA (cfDNA) next-generation sequencing is a noninvasive approach for genomic testing. We report the frequency of identifying alterations and their clinical actionability in patients with advanced/metastatic cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsProspectively consented patients had cfDNA testing performed. Alterations were assessed for therapeutic implications.

resultsWe enrolled 575 patients with 37 tumor types. Of these patients, 438 (76.2%) had at least one alteration detected, and 205 (35.7%) had one or more alterations of high potential for clinical action. In diseases with 10 or more patients enrolled, 50% or more had at least one alteration deemed of high potential for clinical action. Trials were identified in 80% of patients (286 of 357) with any alteration and in 92% of patients (188 of 205) with one or more alterations of high potential for clinical action of whom 57.6% (118 of 205) had 6 or more months of follow-up available. Of these patients, 10% (12 of 118) had received genomically matched therapy through enrollment in clinical trials (n = 8), off-label drug use (n = 3), or standard of care (n = 1). Although 88.6% of all patients had a performance status of 0 or 1 upon enrollment, the primary reason for not acting on alterations was poor performance status at next treatment change (28.1%; 27 of 96).

conclusioncfDNA testing represents a readily accessible method for genomic testing and allows for detection of genomic alterations in most patients with advanced disease. Utility may be higher in patients interested in investigational therapeutics with adequate performance status. Additional study is needed to determine whether utility is enhanced by testing earlier in the treatment course.

Identifiers

PMID32923868
PMCPMC7448805
OpenAlexW2976997362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.