Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923867›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2019

Genomic Profiling for

Martin E Gutierrez, Kristin S Price, Richard B Lanman, Rebecca J Nagy, Irfan Shah, Shivam Mathura, Michael Mulcahy, Andrew D Norden, Stuart L Goldberg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Molecular diagnostics tailoring personalized cancer therapy-an oncologist's view.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Response to osimertinib in a colorectal cancer patient with anWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
    Article
  17. Staging of colorectal cancer using lipid biomarkers and machine learning.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Middle East and North Africa Registry to Characterize Rate of RAS Testing Status in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Martin E GutierrezJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ.
Kristin S PriceGuardant Health, Redwood City, CA.
Richard B LanmanGuardant Health, Redwood City, CA.
Rebecca J NagyGuardant Health, Redwood City, CA.
Irfan ShahCota Healthcare, New York, NY.
Shivam MathuraCota Healthcare, New York, NY.
Michael MulcahyCota Healthcare, New York, NY.
Andrew D NordenCota Healthcare, New York, NY.
Stuart L GoldbergJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ.
Medidata (United States) · USGuardant (United States) · USHackensack University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGenomic testing is recognized in national guidelines as essential to guide appropriate therapy selection in metastatic colorectal cancer. Previous studies report adherence to testing guidelines is suboptimal, but current testing rates have not been assessed. This study reports testing rates in metastatic colon cancer (mCC) for guideline-recommended biomarkers in a US-based population. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective review of data extracted from electronic medical records was performed to identify patients with pathologically confirmed mCC and describe patterns of guideline-aligned biomarker testing. Data were extracted from the electronic health records of 1,497 patients treated at 23 practices across the United States. Both community and academic centers were represented.

resultsA total of 1,497 patients with mCC diagnosed between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017 were identified. Guideline-aligned biomarker testing rates for

conclusionDespite guideline recommendations and significant therapeutic implications, overall biomarker testing rates in mCC remain suboptimal. Adherence to guideline-recommended biomarker testing would potentially reduce exposure to expensive and ineffective therapies, resulting in improved patient outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID32923867
PMCPMC7448804
OpenAlexW2994294167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.