ReviewJCO precision oncology2019
Trial Design Challenges and Approaches for Precision Oncology in Rare Tumors: Experiences of the Children's Oncology Group.
Review in JCO precision oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmenting randomized clinical trial data with historical control data: Precision medicine applications.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2023Trial
- Brentuximab Vedotin with Chemotherapy in Pediatric High-Risk Hodgkin's Lymphoma.The New England journal of medicine · 2022Trial
- Accuracy of remote diagnosis of oral mucositis in children and adolescents with cancer using a mobile App: a pilot study.Brazilian oral research · 2026Article
- Emerging small molecule strategies target cancer stem cells through ferroptosis and metabostemness.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Benchmarking Transformer Embedding Models for Biomedical Terminology Standardization.Machine learning with applications · 2025Article
- Group sequential design for time-to-event outcome with non-proportional hazards using the concept of relative time utilizing two different Weibull distributions.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2024Article
- Platform trials for rare cancers-A complex innovation to accelerate knowledge.Neuro-oncology practice · 2024Article
- Efficiency of Biomarker-Driven Clinical Trial Designs.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024Article
- Considerations on Design and Analysis of External Control in Pediatric Oncology.Medical research archives · 2024Article
- Clinical Trials on Cellular Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Cancer: A 15-Year Trend in the United States.Cureus · 2023Article
- Exploiting frequent and specific expression of PRL3 in pediatric solid tumors for first-in-child use of PRL3-zumab humanized antibody.Molecular therapy oncolytics · 2023Article
- Translating Precision Health for Pediatrics: A Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Access to novel drugs and therapeutics for children and youth: Eliciting citizens' values to inform public funding decisions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Article
- Review
- Drugging Hijacked Kinase Pathways in Pediatric Oncology: Opportunities and Current Scenario.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Article
- N-of-1 Trials in Pediatric Oncology: From a Population-Based Approach to Personalized Medicine-A Review.Cancers · 2021Review
- Value of Adaptive Trials and Surrogate Endpoints for Clinical Decision-Making in Rare Cancers.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Ethical considerations of genetic and genomic testing in pediatric oncology: A narrative review.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the United States, cancer remains the leading cause of disease-related death in children. Although survival from any pediatric cancer has improved dramatically during past decades, a number of cancers continue to yield dismal prognoses, which has motivated the continued study of novel therapeutic strategies. Furthermore, even patients cured of pediatric cancer often experience severe adverse effects of treatment and other long-term health implications, such as cardiotoxicity or loss of fertility. For these patients, improved risk stratification to identify those who could safely receive alternate or less-intensive therapy without affecting prognosis is a key objective. Fortunately, pediatric cancers are rare overall, but even among patients with the same narrow cancer type, there is often broad heterogeneity in terms of prognosis, molecular features or pathology, current treatment strategies, and scientific objectives. As a result, the design of clinical trials in the pediatric cancer setting is challenged by a number of practical issues that must be addressed to ensure trial feasibility for this vulnerable group of patients. In this review, we discuss some of the unique trial design considerations often encountered in any rare tumor setting through the lens of our experiences as faculty statisticians for the Children's Oncology Group, the largest organization in the world dedicated exclusively to pediatric cancer research and clinical trials. These topics include risk stratification within individual trials, relaxation of trial operating characteristics and parameters, use of historical controls, and address of noninferiority-type objectives in small cohorts. We review each in terms of practical motivation, present challenges, and potential solutions described in the literature and implemented in selected example trials from the Children's Oncology Group.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.