ArticleACS omega2020
Three-Dimensional, MultiScale, and Interconnected Trabecular Bone Mimic Porous Tantalum Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering.
Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progress and challenges of tantalum-containing biomaterials in regenerative medicine applications.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Bone regeneration using adipose derived stem cell spheroids within 3D printed scaffolds in a rabbit radial defect model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bioinspired 3D Bone Model: Mimicking the Cortical-Spongy Bone Architecture and Biology for Enhanced Physiological Representation of Bone.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Progress of porous tantalum surface-modified biomaterial coatings in bone tissue engineering.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025Review
- Biomechanical analysis of a newly designed and 3D printed plate-locking interbody cage: an observational study of finite element analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Biomimetic multizonal scaffolds for the reconstruction of zonal articular cartilage in chondral and osteochondral defects.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Clinical Application of 3D-Printed Artificial Vertebral Body (3DP AVB): A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Microstructure Optimization for Design of Porous Tantalum Scaffolds Based on Mechanical Properties and Permeability.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Static Compressive Behavior and Failure Mechanism of Tantalum Scaffolds with Optimized Periodic Lattice Fabricated by Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2023Article
- 3D bioprinting of human mesenchymal stem cells-laden hydrogels incorporating MXene for spontaneous osteodifferentiation.Heliyon · 2023Article
- 3D printing method for bone tissue engineering scaffold.Medicine in novel technology and devices · 2023Article
- Influence of porosity on osteogenesis, bone growth and osteointegration in trabecular tantalum scaffolds fabricated by additive manufacturing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Preparation, modification, and clinical application of porous tantalum scaffolds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Research progress and clinical translation of three-dimensional printed porous tantalum in orthopaedics.Biomaterials translational · 2023Review
- Recent advances on bioactive baghdadite ceramic for bone tissue engineering applications: 20 years of research and innovation (a review).Materials today. Bio · 2022Review
- Frontiers of Hydroxyapatite Composites in Bionic Bone Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Morphometric analysis of patient-specific 3D-printed acetabular cups: a comparative study of commercially available implants from 6 manufacturers.3D printing in medicine · 2022Article
- Experimental study of a 3D printed permanent implantable porous Ta-coated bone plate for fracture fixation.Bioactive materials · 2022Article
- Current Biomaterial-Based Bone Tissue Engineering and Translational Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the biocompatibility and bone ingrowth properties of a novel trabecular bone mimic porous tantalum scaffold which holds potential for bone tissue engineering, a novel three-dimensional, multiscale interconnected porous tantalum scaffold was designed and manufactured. The morphology of the novel scaffold was observed with the use of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and industrial computerized tomography. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were cultured with novel porous tantalum powder, SEM was carried out for the observation of cell morphology and adhesion, and cytotoxicity was evaluated by the MTT assay. Canine femoral shaft bone defect models were established, and novel porous tantalum rods were used to repair the bone defect. Repair effects and bone integration were evaluated by hard tissue slice examination and push-out tests at the indicated time. We found that the novel porous tantalum scaffold is a trabecular bone mimic, having the characteristics of being three-dimensional, multiscaled, and interconnected. The MSCs adhered to the surface of tantalum and proliferated with time, the tantalum extract did not have a cytotoxic effect on MSCs. In the bone defect model, porous tantalum rods integrated tightly with the host bone, and new bone formation was found on the scaffold-host bone interface both 3 and 6 months after the implantation. Favorable bone ingrowth was observed in the center of the tantalum rod. The push-out test showed that the strength needed to push out the tantalum rod is comparable for both 3 and 6 months when compared with the normal femoral shaft bone tissue. These findings suggested that the novel trabecular bone mimic porous tantalum scaffold is biocompatible and osteoinductive, which holds potential for bone tissue engineering application.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.