Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923746›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in systems biology2017

Designing and interpreting 'multi-omic' experiments that may change our understanding of biology.

Robert Haas, Aleksej Zelezniak, Jacopo Iacovacci, Stephan Kamrad, StJohn Townsend, Markus Ralser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in systems biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Secondary metabolism ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. RettDb: the Rett syndrome omics database to navigate the Rett syndrome genomic landscape.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Metabolomes evolve faster than metabolic network structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Pan-Omics in Sheep: Unveiling Genetic Landscapes.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert HaasThe Molecular Biology of Metabolism Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.
Aleksej ZelezniakThe Molecular Biology of Metabolism Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.
Jacopo IacovacciThe Molecular Biology of Metabolism Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.
Stephan KamradThe Molecular Biology of Metabolism Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.
StJohn TownsendThe Molecular Biology of Metabolism Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.
Markus RalserThe Molecular Biology of Metabolism Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK FC001134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most biological mechanisms involve more than one type of biomolecule, and hence operate not solely at the level of either genome, transcriptome, proteome, metabolome or ionome. Datasets resulting from single-omic analysis are rapidly increasing in throughput and quality, rendering multi-omic studies feasible. These should offer a comprehensive, structured and interactive overview of a biological mechanism. However, combining single-omic datasets in a meaningful manner has so far proved challenging, and the discovery of new biological information lags behind expectation. One reason is that experiments conducted in different laboratories can typically not to be combined without restriction. Second, the interpretation of multi-omic datasets represents a significant challenge by nature, as the biological datasets are heterogeneous not only for technical, but also for biological, chemical, and physical reasons. Here, multi-layer network theory and methods of artificial intelligence might contribute to solve these problems. For the efficient application of machine learning however, biological datasets need to become more systematic, more precise - and much larger. We conclude our review with basic guidelines for the successful set-up of a multi-omic experiment.

Identifiers

PMID32923746
PMCPMC7477987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.