Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923665›Full record

ArticleMarshall journal of medicine2018

Effect of removing outliers on statistical inference: implications to interpretation of experimental data in medical research.

Todd W Gress, James Denvir, Joseph I Shapiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Marshall journal of medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Predicting Tracheostomy Need on Admission to the Intensive Care Unit-A Multicenter Machine Learning Analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Todd W GressMarshall University, Huntington, West Virginia.
James DenvirMarshall University, Huntington, West Virginia.
Joseph I ShapiroMarshall University, Huntington, West Virginia.

Funding

CORAL: Clinical Coordinating CenterU01HL071556 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI COOPER, CHRISTOPHER J · 2004 to 2013
$19.3M
Regulation of Tight Junction Molecular Composition by Na/K-ATPaseP20GM121299 · NIGMS · MARSHALL UNIVERSITY · PI HAYNES, JENNIFER · 2018 to 2022
$10.6M
Receptor Na/K-ATPase Antagonists As Novel Therapeutics For Renal/Cardiac DiseasesR01HL109015 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI SHAPIRO, JOSEPH ISAAC, XIE, ZIJIAN · 2011 to 2014
$2.2M
Na/K-ATPase Reduction in Renal Disease-Related Cardiac DysfunctionR01HL105649 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO HEALTH SCI CAMPUS · PI TIAN, JIANG · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105649NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109015NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL071556NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData editing with elimination of "outliers" is commonly performed in the biomedical sciences. The effects of this type of data editing could influence study results, and with the vast and expanding amount of research in medicine, these effects would be magnified. METHODS AND

resultsWe first performed an anonymous survey of medical school faculty at institutions across the United States and found that indeed some form of outlier exclusion was performed by a large percentage of the respondents to the survey. We next performed Monte Carlo simulations of excluding high and low values from samplings from the same normal distribution. We found that removal of one pair of "outliers", specifically removal of the high and low values of the two samplings, respectively, had measurable effects on the type I error as the sample size was increased into the thousands. We developed an adjustment to the t score that accounts for the anticipated alteration of the type I error (t

conclusionData editing with elimination of outliers that includes removal of high and low values from two samples, respectively, can have significant effects on the occurrence of type 1 error. This type of data editing could have profound effects in high volume research fields, particularly in medicine, and we recommend an adjustment to the t score be used to reduce the potential for error.

Indexed as

experimental designnon-parametricnormal distributionoutliersparametric

Identifiers

PMID32923665
PMCPMC7485938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.