ArticleScience advances2020
3D printed patient-specific aortic root models with internal sensors for minimally invasive applications.
Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The application of 3D printing in preoperative planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review.Biomedical engineering online · 2022Pooled it
- Directional Inner-Surface Printing for High-Resolution Conformal Electronics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Feed-Draw Printing Enables Monolithically Integrated Flexible Sensors With High Interfacial Toughness and Wide Linear Range.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- The cyber-physical paradigm for lifetime aortic valve management: a synthesis of robotics, artificial intelligence, and augmented reality.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Development and Radiological Evaluation of 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Lung Phantoms: From CT Imaging to 3D Modeling and Material Characterization.Research square · 2026Article
- Ex Vivo Quantification of Calcification Stiffness in Aortic Stenosis: Biomechanical Data from Resected Human Valves.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- 3D printed anisotropic tissue simulants with embedded fluid capsules for medical simulation and training.Science advances · 2025Article
- Enhancing auricular reconstruction: A biomimetic scaffold with 3D-printed multiscale porous structure utilizing chondrogenic activity ink.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- AI-Powered Multimodal Modeling of Personalized Hemodynamics in Aortic Stenosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- 3D-Printed Artificial Organ Models for Surgical Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Neural network-enabled, all-electronic control of non-Newtonian fluid flow.Applied physics letters · 2024Article
- 3D printing tissue-engineered scaffolds for auricular reconstruction.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- 3D-Printed Flexible Microfluidic Health Monitor forACS sensors · 2024Article
- The Application of Precision Medicine in Structural Heart Diseases: A Step towards the Future.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Rapid segmentation of computed tomography angiography images of the aortic valve: the efficacy and clinical value of a deep learning algorithm.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Recent advances in 3D bioprinted cartilage-mimicking constructs for applications in tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Intelligent Vascularized 3D/4D/5D/6D-Printed Tissue Scaffolds.Nano-micro letters · 2023Review
- Minimally invasive bioprinting forBioactive materials · 2023Article
- Soft robotic patient-specific hydrodynamic model of aortic stenosis and ventricular remodeling.Science robotics · 2023Article
- A benchmark study of convolutional neural networks in fully automatic segmentation of aortic root.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgeries have numerous advantages, yet complications may arise from limited knowledge about the anatomical site targeted for the delivery of therapy. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a minimally invasive procedure for treating aortic stenosis. Here, we demonstrate multimaterial three-dimensional printing of patient-specific soft aortic root models with internally integrated electronic sensor arrays that can augment testing for TAVR preprocedural planning. We evaluated the efficacies of the models by comparing their geometric fidelities with postoperative data from patients, as well as their in vitro hemodynamic performances in cases with and without leaflet calcifications. Furthermore, we demonstrated that internal sensor arrays can facilitate the optimization of bioprosthetic valve selections and in vitro placements via mapping of the pressures applied on the critical regions of the aortic anatomies. These models may pave exciting avenues for mitigating the risks of postoperative complications and facilitating the development of next-generation medical devices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.