Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923593›Full record

ArticleScience advances2020

The bystander effect in rats.

John L Havlik, Yuri Y Vieira Sugano, Maura Clement Jacobi, Rahul R Kukreja, John H Clement Jacobi, Peggy Mason

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Body language signals for rodent social communication.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John L HavlikDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0471-7995
Yuri Y Vieira SuganoDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4581-2745
Maura Clement JacobiPritzker Medical School, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5568-5014
Rahul R KukrejaDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0315-9554
John H Clement JacobiDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7927-2110
Peggy MasonDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5143-666X
University of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate whether the classic bystander effect is unique to humans, the effect of bystanders on rat helping was studied. In the presence of rats rendered incompetent to help through pharmacological treatment, rats were less likely to help due to a reduction in reinforcement rather than to a lack of initial interest. Only incompetent helpers of a strain familiar to the helper rat exerted a detrimental effect on helping; rats helped at near control levels in the presence of incompetent helpers from an unfamiliar strain. Duos and trios of potential helper rats helped at superadditive rates, demonstrating that rats act nonindependently with helping facilitated by the presence of competent-to-help bystanders. Furthermore, helping was facilitated in rats that had previously observed other rats' helping and were then tested individually. In sum, the influence of bystanders on helping behavior in rats features characteristics that closely resemble those observed in humans.

Identifiers

PMID32923593
PMCPMC7455499
OpenAlexW3041889516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.