ArticleArthroplasty today2020
Multiacquisition Variable-Resonance Image Combination Magnetic Resonance Imaging Used to Study Detailed Bone Apposition and Fixation of an Additively Manufactured Cementless Acetabular Shell.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-reported and radiographic outcomes of a porous-coated acetabular cup in robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty at 2-year follow up.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Failure of Screw/Shell Interface in the Trident II Acetabular System in Total Hip Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2022Article
- Off-the-shelf 3D printed titanium cups in primary total hip arthroplasty.World journal of orthopedics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe ability to utilize magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess bony fixation in 3 dimensions may allow a better understanding of the implant design and bony integration. We hypothesized that a new 3-dimensionally printed cementless highly porous acetabular component (Stryker Trident II Tritanium
methodsMultiacquisition variable-resonance image combination selective metal suppression MRI was performed in 19 patients implanted with a new 3-dimensionally printed cup and 20 patients who had received a previous-generation cup from the same manufacturer at 1-year follow-up. Each cup was graded globally as well as by 9 specific zones. Integration grades were performed for each zone: 0, full bone integration; 1, fibrous membrane present; 2, osteolysis; and 3, fluid present. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to compare fixation between the 2 groups.
resultsAll cups in both cohorts showed greater than 90% estimated global bony integration (3-dimensionally printed cups, 99.4%; regular cups 91.6%) with no osteolysis or fluid observed in any cup. The 3-dimensionally printed cup had 1 of 171 zones (0.6%) graded as fibrous membrane present, while the 2-dimensional group had 15 of 180 zones (8.3%) graded as fibrous. Of note, screw hole regions were omitted but may be read as fibrous membrane areas.
conclusionUsing multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination selective MRI, our analysis showed greater osteointegration and less fibrous membrane formation in the 3-dimensionally printed cups than the control group at 1-year follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.