ArticleFrontiers in public health2020
Bibliometric Analysis on COVID-19: A Comparison of Research Between English and Chinese Studies.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cranberry-derived bioactives for the prevention and treatment of urinary tract infections: antimicrobial mechanisms and global research trends in nutraceutical applications.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Global trends in dementia care research in the context of COVID-19: bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Molecular imaging research in atherosclerosis: A 23-year scientometric and visual analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Pooled it
- Bibliometric study of neuroinflammation in autism spectrum disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- The evolution of research on depression during COVID-19: A visual analysis using Co-Occurrence and VOSviewer.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Literature on the Early Phase of COVID-19 in Italy.Frontiers in public health · 2021Pooled it
- Topic modeling and evolutionary trends of China's language policy: A LDA-ARIMA approach.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Research status and future focus onHeliyon · 2024Review
- A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis of Published Literature Assessing Fear of COVID-19.Clinics and practice · 2024Article
- Bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Morocco: short communication.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Focusing on the Development and Current Status of Metamaterial Absorber by Bibliometric Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- An investigation of emerging COVID-19 research trends and future implications for LIS field: A bibliometric mapping and visualization.Journal of librarianship and information science · 2023Article
- Adaptation and altitude sickness: A 40-year bibliometric analysis and collaborative networks.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Bibliometric analysis of real-time PCR-based pathogen detection in plant protection research: a comprehensive study.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- COVID research across the social sciences in 2020: a bibliometric approach.Scientometrics · 2023Article
- The development of new remote technologies in disaster medicine education: A scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Science Mapping: A Bibliometric Analysis on Cyberbullying and the Psychological Dimensions of the Self.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Mapping the Scientific Research on Suicide and Physical Activity: A Bibliometric Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Global Research Trends on Monkeypox Virus: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.