Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923315›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2020

Agent-based modeling insights into the optimal distribution of the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program.

Stephanie Schauder, Michael R Thomsen, Rodolfo M Nayga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie SchauderDepartment of Economics, Cornell University, Uris 429, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States.
Michael R ThomsenDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Agriculture Building 226, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.
Rodolfo M NaygaFood Policy Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics & Agribusiness, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Agriculture Building 217, Fayetteville, AR 72701, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP) program provides a free fresh fruit or vegetable snack to children in low-income schools between two and five times a week. This is an important nationwide program, but current funding levels are insufficient to reach all eligible schools. Thus, there is a need to develop insight on contextual factors that may impact the effectiveness of FFVP in facilitating the development of childhood food preferences. An agent-based model of preference formation is used to understand how exposure to FFVP in early elementary school may affect preferences for healthy food by 6th grade. Preferences are modeled using the temporal difference learning algorithm used by Hammond et al. (2012). This model simulates habit formation in the context of food by modeling preference formation in terms of positive or negative feedback about the food most recently consumed. The model is designed to provide insights into how different patterns of exposure to FFVP affect preferences, and how living in a food desert changes the effect of FFVP. We use data on 35,981 students from Arkansas elementary schools (from 2008 to 2016) and information about the commercial food environment in Arkansas communities to populate the model. We find that early FFVP exposure is more beneficial than late exposure conditional on the number of years exposed. We also find that FFVP is more beneficial for children who grow up in environments lacking healthy food.

Indexed as

Appetite RegulationComputer SimulationFood PreferencesFruitGovernment ProgramsPediatric ObesityResource AllocationVegetables

Identifiers

PMID32923315
PMCPMC7475199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.