ArticleCureus2020
Surgical Outcomes in Children With Primary Congenital Glaucoma: An Eight-Year Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy versus Conventional Surgery in Primary Congenital Glaucoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Effect of Trabeculodescemetic Window Perforation in Deep Sclerectomy on Intraocular Pressure in Primary Congenital Glaucoma.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
- Epidemiology and long-term outcomes of primary congenital glaucoma: a population-based study.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Challenges in Surgical Intervention for a Rare Case of Anterior Segment Dysgenesis: A Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2023Article
- Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy versus combined trabeculotomy-trabeculectomy in primary congenital glaucoma.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) is a congenital anomaly arising from an unusual development of the filtration angle, causing a remarkable rise in intraocular pressure (IOP) that is irrelevant to other ocular or systemic deformities. Purpose The aim of the current study was to evaluate the surgical outcome in PCG patients between 2011 and February 2019. Methods This was a retrospective study of PCG patients who underwent trabeculotomy, trabeculectomy, deep sclerectomy, Ahmed valve, and/or cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) at a tertiary hospital. The IOP must be equal or less than 21 mmHg with or without medication to be designated a successful surgery. Results A total of 80 eyes (41 patients) were included in the study, with a slight male predominance of 65.9%. At presentation, the most reported age group was under 30 days (46.3%). Moreover, deep sclerotomy was the most common procedure, followed by CPC, which were performed in 48 (58.5%) and 18 (21.9%) eyes, respectively. In the overall group, the mean initial IOP was 23.65±8.52 mmHg, while the mean IOP was 16.73±8.56 mmHg at final follow-ups (p < 0.001), with a 46% reduction. The mean axial length showed a slight progression from 21.11±2.58 at the initial visit to 22.92±3.57 mm at the last follow-up (p<0.001). However, the mean horizontal diameter increased from 12.63±1.83 mm at the initial visit to 13.31±1.13 mm at the final visit (p=0.004). Conclusion An excellent IOP reduction could be accomplished in the majority of eyes. Deep sclerectomy can effectively reduce IOP in PCG without the occurrences of serious complications that are commonly seen after other procedures like trabeculectomy or trabeculotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.