Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923182›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Physiological, biochemical and genetic responses of Caucasian tea (

Lidiia S Samarina, Lyudmila S Malyukova, Alexander M Efremov, Taisiya A Simonyan, Alexandra O Matskiv, Natalia G Koninskaya, Ruslan S Rakhmangulov, Maya V Gvasaliya, Valentina I Malyarovskaya, Alexey V Ryndin and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Plant Biology and Biotechnology: Focus on Genomics and Bioinformatics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biochemical and Genetic Responses of Tea (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lidiia S SamarinaFederal Research Centre the "Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Sochi, Russia.
Lyudmila S MalyukovaFederal Research Centre the "Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Sochi, Russia.
Alexander M EfremovFederal Research Centre the "Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Sochi, Russia.
Taisiya A SimonyanFederal Research Centre the "Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Sochi, Russia.
Alexandra O MatskivFederal Research Centre the "Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Sochi, Russia.
Natalia G KoninskayaFederal Research Centre the "Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Sochi, Russia.
Ruslan S RakhmangulovFederal Research Centre the "Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Sochi, Russia.
Maya V GvasaliyaFederal Research Centre the "Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Sochi, Russia.
Valentina I MalyarovskayaFederal Research Centre the "Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Sochi, Russia.
Alexey V RyndinFederal Research Centre the "Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Sochi, Russia.
Yuriy L OrlovFederal Research Centre the "Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Sochi, Russia.
Wei TongState Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China.
Magda-Viola HankeFederal Research Centre the "Subtropical Scientific Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences", Sochi, Russia.
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Floriculture and Subtropical Crops · RURussian Academy of Sciences · RUAnhui Agricultural University · CNNovosibirsk State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCold and frost are two serious factors limiting the yield of many crops worldwide, including the tea plant

methodsThe aim of the current research was to evaluate the physiological, biochemical and genetic responses of tolerant and sensitive tea cultivars exposed to cold (0 to +2 °C for 7 days) and frost (-6 to -8 °C for 5 days). Relative water content, cell membranes integrity, pH of the cell sap, water soluble protein, cations, sugars, amino acids were measured under cold and frost. Comparative expression of the following genes ICE1, CBF1, WRKY2, DHN1, DHN2, DHN3, NAC17, NAC26, NAC30, SnRK1.1, SnRK1.2, SnRK1.3, bHLH7, bHLH43, P5CS, LOX1, LOX6, LOX7 were analyzed.

resultsWe found elevated protein (by 3-4 times) and cations (potassium, calcium and magnesium) contents in the leaves of both cultivars under cold and frost treatments. Meanwhile, Leu, Met, Val, Thr, Ser were increased under cold and frost, however tolerant cv. Gruzinskii7 showed earlier accumulation of these amino acids. Out of 18 studied genes, 11 were expressed at greater level in the frost- tolerant cultivar comparing with frost-sensitive one

Indexed as

Amino acids contentCamellia sinensisCationsClimate adaptationFrost toleranceGene expressionOsmotic stressPlant physiology

Identifiers

PMID32923182
PMCPMC7457925
OpenAlexW3081759628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.