Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923120›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology2020

Deep immune profiling of ovarian tumors identifies minimal MHC-I expression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as negatively associated with T-cell-dependent outcome.

Kim L Brunekreeft, Sterre T Paijens, Maartje C A Wouters, Fenne L Komdeur, Florine A Eggink, Joyce M Lubbers, Hagma H Workel, Elisabeth C Van Der Slikke, Noor E J Pröpper, Ninke Leffers and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Advances in immunotherapies in ovarian cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kim L BrunekreeftDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sterre T PaijensDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maartje C A WoutersTrev and Joyce Deeley Research Centre, BC Cancer, BC Cancer, Victoria, Canada.
Fenne L KomdeurDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Florine A EgginkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joyce M LubbersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hagma H WorkelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth C Van Der SlikkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Noor E J PröpperDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ninke LeffersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Julien AdamDepartment of Clinical Biology, Institut De Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Paris, France.
Harry PijperDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Annechien PlatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Arjan KolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hans W NijmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1821-3042
Marco De BruynDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLBreast Cancer Research Foundation · USInstitut Gustave Roussy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial Ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecological malignancy and has limited curative therapeutic options. Immunotherapy for EOC is promising, but clinical efficacy remains restricted to a small percentage of patients. Several lines of evidence suggest that the low response rate might be improved by combining immunotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel, the standard-of-care chemotherapy for EOC. Here, we assessed the immune contexture of EOC tumors, draining lymph nodes, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells during carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy. We observed that the immune contexture of EOC patients is defined by the tissue of origin, independent of exposure to chemotherapy. Summarized, draining lymph nodes were characterized by a quiescent microenvironment composed of mostly non-proliferating naïve CD4 + T cells. Circulating T cells shared phenotypic features of both lymph nodes and tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Immunologically 'hot' ovarian tumors were characterized by ICOS, GITR, and PD-1 expression on CD4 + and CD8 + cells, independent of chemotherapy. The presence of PD-1 + cells in tumors prior to, but not after, chemotherapy was associated with disease-specific survival (DSS). Accordingly, we observed high MHC-I expression in tumors prior to chemotherapy, but minimal MHC-I expression in tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, even though there were no differences in the number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in both groups. We therefore speculate that the TIL influx into the chemotherapy tumor microenvironment may be a consequence of the general inflammatory nature of chemotherapy-experienced tumors. Strategies to upregulate MHC-I during or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy may thus improve treatment outcome in these patients.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingRetrospective StudiesTumor Microenvironmentcancer immunologychemotherapyEpithelial ovarian cancerMHC-Itumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID32923120
PMCPMC7458665
OpenAlexW3025487555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.