ArticleAmerican journal of cardiovascular disease2020
Coronary artery disease in the young in the US population-based cohort.
Article in American journal of cardiovascular disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional capacity in smoking patients after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a quasi-experimental study.Journal of medicine and life · 2023Article
- Distribution of Coronary Artery Calcium by Age, Sex, and Race Among Patients 30-45 Years Old.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022Article
- High-Intensity Statin Use Among Patients With Atherosclerosis in the U.S.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022Article
- Long-Term Outcomes for Chinese COPD Patients After PCI: A Propensity Score Matched, Double-Cohort Study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Observation of Curative Effect of Trimetazidine Combined with Metoprolol in Elderly Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Complicated with Heart Failure and the Effect of Myocardial Remodeling by Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular diseases mortality and alcohol control policy in Lithuania: exploring a possible link.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Predictors of Coronary Artery Calcium and Long-Term Risks of Death, Myocardial Infarction, and Stroke in Young Adults.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough most prevalent in the elderly, coronary artery disease (CAD) also affects younger adults. However, CAD in young adults is not as well characterized.
objectiveTo explore factors associated with CAD in young patients.
methodsWe investigated the prevalence and baseline characteristics of young patients with CAD using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) survey between 1999 and 2016. The primary outcome was a reported history of CAD at age <55 years old, defined based on the subject's response to survey questions 'Have you ever been told by a physician that you had coronary artery disease?' and 'How old were you when were told you had coronary heart disease?'. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess factors associated with CAD in young patients.
resultsOf 42,038 NHANES participants, 707 (1.7%) reported CAD at young age. Young patients with CAD were more likely to be male, non-whites, cigarette smokers, recreational drug users, had a family history of CAD, compared to young patients without CAD (all
conclusionCAD in young patients may be influenced by lifestyle factors such as alcohol consumption or cocaine use, as well as conventional risk factors such as smoking or diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32923100PMC7486526W3086663134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.