Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32923068›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2020

Performance tradeoffs for single- and dual-objective open-top light-sheet microscope designs: a simulation-based analysis.

Kevin W Bishop, Adam K Glaser, Jonathan T C Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recent advances in oblique plane microscopy.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin W BishopDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8722-6464
Adam K GlaserDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3558-8994
Jonathan T C LiuDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5650-3086

Funding

Intraoperative confocal microscopy for quantitative delineation of low-grade glioR01CA175391 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, JONATHAN T.C., SANAI, NADER · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Light-sheet micro-aspiration microscopy for the isolation and analysis of rare tumor cells from intact clinical specimensK99CA240681 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GLASER, ADAM K · 2019 to 2020
$316k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA240681NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light-sheet microscopy (LSM) has emerged as a powerful tool for high-speed volumetric imaging of live model organisms and large optically cleared specimens. When designing cleared-tissue LSM systems with certain desired imaging specifications (e.g. resolution, contrast, and working distance), various design parameters must be taken into consideration. In order to elucidate some of the key design tradeoffs for LSM systems, we present a diffraction-based analysis of single- and dual-objective LSM configurations using simulations of LSM point spread functions. We assume Gaussian illumination is utilized. Specifically, we analyze the effects of the illumination and collection numerical aperture (NA), as well as their crossing angle, on spatial resolution and contrast. Assuming an open-top light-sheet (OTLS) architecture, we constrain these parameters based on fundamental geometric considerations as well as those imposed by currently available microscope objectives. In addition to revealing the performance tradeoffs of various single- and dual-objective LSM configurations, our analysis showcases the potential advantages of a novel, non-orthogonal dual-objective (NODO) architecture, especially for moderate-resolution imaging applications (collection NA of 0.5 to 0.8).

Identifiers

PMID32923068
PMCPMC7449713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.