ArticleChinese neurosurgical journal2019
Giant serpentine aneurysm of the internal cerebral artery and mandibular aneurysm: a case report.
Article in Chinese neurosurgical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive Evaluation of Serpentine Aneurysms: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with a Subanalysis for Treatment Approaches.Clinical neuroradiology · 2024Pooled it
- Parent Artery Occlusion for a Giant Serpentine Aneurysm of the Internal Carotid Artery under Electrophysiological Monitoring: A Case Report.Journal of neuroendovascular therapy · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and management for intracranial serpentine aneurysms: a 12-year single-center retrospective analysis of 51 patients.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- A comprehensive analysis and systematic review of giant serpentine aneurysms.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Endovascular occlusion of giant serpentine aneurysm: A case report and literature review.Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery · 2022Article
- Flow diversion treatment for giant intracranial serpentine aneurysms.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiant serpentine aneurysms (GSA) originate from saccular or spindle aneurysm, dissimilar from dissected aneurysm, that are defined as partially thrombosed giant aneurysms with tortuous internal vascular channel. The clinical and neuroradiologic characteristics are clarified and the mechanism of formation and the efficacy of double stent implantation in GSA are discussed. CASE PRESENTATION: An 18-year-old man presented himself with a GSA arising from the internal cerebral artery (ICA). In addition, a mandibular aneurysm (MA) arose from the external cerebral artery (ECA). Success was achieved in treating GSA through endovascular treatment with double stents implanted in the parent artery, which were LEO stent and Tubridge flow diverter. After 1 year of follow-up, three-dimensional reconstruction of blood vessels revealed the disappearance of the serpentine access of GSA, which was found to be replaced with a roughly normal vascular structure.
conclusionsDouble stent implantation has provided a feasible treatment option for giant serpentine internal carotid aneurysms and eliminated the possibility of causing collateral circulation occlusion. Therefore, it represents a simple and suitable treatment method for anatomical structure and operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.