Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32922762›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2020

Cement augmentation of calcar screws may provide the greatest reduction in predicted screw cut-out risk for proximal humerus plating based on validated parametric computational modelling: Augmenting proximal humerus fracture plating.

Peter Varga, Jason A Inzana, James W A Fletcher, Ladina Hofmann-Fliri, Armin Runer, Norbert P Südkamp, Markus Windolf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Peter VargaAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2738-6436
Jason A InzanaAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5221-273X
James W A FletcherAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4147-5013
Ladina Hofmann-FliriAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7776-0962
Armin RunerMedical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria.
Norbert P SüdkampDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5913-624X
Markus WindolfAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Graubünden, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-6914
AO Foundation · CHInnsbruck Medical University · ATUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsFixation of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures remains challenging even with state-of-the-art locking plates. Despite the demonstrated biomechanical benefit of screw tip augmentation with bone cement, the clinical findings have remained unclear, potentially as the optimal augmentation combinations are unknown. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the biomechanical benefits of the augmentation options in a humeral locking plate using finite element analysis (FEA).

methodsA total of 64 cement augmentation configurations were analyzed using six screws of a locking plate to virtually fix unstable three-part fractures in 24 low-density proximal humerus models under three physiological loading cases (4,608 simulations). The biomechanical benefit of augmentation was evaluated through an established FEA methodology using the average peri-screw bone strain as a validated predictor of cyclic cut-out failure.

resultsThe biomechanical benefit was already significant with a single cemented screw and increased with the number of augmented screws, but the configuration was highly influential. The best two-screw (mean 23%, SD 3% reduction) and the worst four-screw (mean 22%, SD 5%) combinations performed similarly. The largest benefits were achieved with augmenting screws purchasing into the calcar and having posteriorly located tips. Local bone mineral density was not directly related to the improvement.

conclusionThe number and configuration of cemented screws strongly determined how augmentation can alleviate the predicted risk of cut-out failure. Screws purchasing in the calcar and posterior humeral head regions may be prioritized. Although requiring clinical corroborations, these findings may explain the controversial results of previous clinical studies not controlling the choices of screw augmentation.

Indexed as

Cement augmentationFinite element analysisLocking plate fixationOsteoporosisProximal humerus fracture

Identifiers

PMID32922762
PMCPMC7469511
OpenAlexW3082404433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.