Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32922744›Full record

ArticlePulmonary circulation

Impact of the updated hemodynamic definitions on diagnosis rates of pulmonary hypertension.

Seda Tanyeri, Ozgur Y Akbal, Berhan Keskin, Aykun Hakgor, Ali Karagoz, Hacer Ceren Tokgoz, Cem Dogan, Zubeyde Bayram, Seyhmus Kulahcioglu, Emrah Erdogan and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seda TanyeriUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozgur Y AkbalUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Berhan KeskinUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Aykun HakgorUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali KaragozUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hacer Ceren TokgozUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cem DoganUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zubeyde BayramUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Seyhmus KulahciogluUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Emrah ErdoganUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ismail BalabanUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-349X
Dogancan CeneliUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Rezzan Deniz AcarUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ibrahim H TanbogaDepartment of Biostatistics, Medical School, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Nihal OzdemirUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cihangir KaymazUniversity of Health Sciences, Kartal Kosuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRİstanbul Nişantaşı Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated whether updated pulmonary hypertension definitive criteria proposed in sixth World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension had an impact on diagnosis of overall pulmonary hypertension and pre-capillary and combined pre- and post-capillary phenotypes as compared to those in European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society 2015 pulmonary hypertension Guidelines. Study group comprised the retrospectively evaluated 1300 patients (age 53.1 ± 18.8 years, female 807, 62.1%) who underwent right heart catheterization with different indications between 2006 and 2018. Mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥25 mmHg (European Society of Cardiology) and PAMP (mean pulmonary arterial pressure) >20 mmHg (World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension) right heart catheterization definitions criteria were used, respectively. For pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤15 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 Wood units criteria were included in the both definitions. Normal mean pulmonary arterial pressure (<21 mmHg), borderline mean pulmonary arterial pressure elevation (21-24 mmHg), and overt pulmonary hypertension (≥25 mmHg) were documented in 21.1, 9.8, and 69.1% of the patients, respectively. The pre-capillary and combined pre- and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension were noted in 2.9 and 1.1%, 8.7 and 2.5%, and 34.6 and 36.6% of the patients with normal mean pulmonary arterial pressure, borderline, and overt pulmonary hypertension subgroups, respectively. The World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension versus European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society definitions resulted in a net 9.8% increase in the diagnosis of overall pulmonary hypertension whereas increases in the pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension and combined pre- and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension diagnosis were only 0.8 and 0.3%, respectively. The re-definition of mean pulmonary arterial pressure threshold seems to increase the frequency of the overall pulmonary hypertension diagnosis. However, this increase was mainly originated from those in post-capillary pulmonary hypertension subgroup whereas its impact on pre-capillary and combined pre- and post-capillary pulmonary hypertension was negligible. Moreover, criteria of pre-capillary pulmonary vascular disease and combined pre- and post-capillary phenotypes were still detectable even in the presence of normal mean pulmonary arterial pressure. The obligatory criteria of pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 Wood units seems to keep specificity for discrimination between pre-capillary versus post-C pulmonary hypertension after lowering the definitive mean pulmonary arterial pressure threshold to 20 mmHg.

Indexed as

diagnostic criteriapulmonary hypertensionright heart catheterizationsixth World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension

Identifiers

PMID32922744
PMCPMC7457658
OpenAlexW3028486647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.