Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32922684›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2020

A comparison of ICD- 11 and DSM-5 criteria for PTSD among a representative sample of Chinese earthquake survivors.

Chengqi Cao, Li Wang, Jianhui Wu, Yajie Bi, Haibo Yang, Ruojiao Fang, Gen Li, Ping Liu, Shu Luo, Brian J Hall and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. PTSD: Past, present and future implications for China.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Inpatient residential treatment program for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): Results from the 2020 Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh) War.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Chengqi CaoCenter for Brain Disorder and Cognitive Science, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Li WangLaboratory for Traumatic Stress Studies, CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1459-3412
Jianhui WuCenter for Brain Disorder and Cognitive Science, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yajie BiLaboratory for Traumatic Stress Studies, CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Haibo YangAcademy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.
Ruojiao FangLaboratory for Traumatic Stress Studies, CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Gen LiLaboratory for Traumatic Stress Studies, CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ping LiuDepartment of Psychosomatics, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, Sichuan, China.
Shu LuoDepartment of Psychosomatics, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, Sichuan, China.
Brian J HallGlobal and Community Mental Health Research Group, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau (SAR), China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9358-2377
Jon D ElhaiDepartment of Psychology, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNDeyang Stomatological Hospital · CNShenzhen University · CNJohns Hopkins University · USTianjin Normal University · CNUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStriking differences regarding the diagnosis of PTSD exist between the ICD-11 and DSM-5. This study compared the prevalence and comorbidity of PTSD between the ICD-11 and DSM-5.

methodsAn epidemiological sample of 1160 Chinese adult earthquake survivors collected nine and a half years following the Wenchuan earthquake, in Sichuan province. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) were used to measure PTSD, depression, and anxiety symptoms.

resultsThe ICD-11 PTSD criteria yielded higher prevalence estimates than the DSM-5 criteria. There were no significant differences in PTSD's comorbidity with major depressive disorder (MDD) or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) between the ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria.

conclusionsResults found that the ICD-11 and DSM-5 performed differently in assessing PTSD prevalence, but showed similar co-occurrence with MDD and GAD. This study adds to knowledge about the similarities and differences of using different PTSD criteria and carries implications for clinical and research utilization of the two widely used PTSD diagnostic criteria.

Indexed as

• A greater proportion of participants met criteria for ICD-11 than DSM-5 PTSD.• ICD-11 and DSM-5 PTSD criteria showed similar co-existing rates with MDD and GAD.comorbidityDSM-5ICD-11posttraumatic stress disorderprevalence

Identifiers

PMID32922684
PMCPMC7448929
OpenAlexW3034164762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.