ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2020
Reproducibility of Objective and Subjective Markers of Exercise Recovery in College Aged Males.
Article in International journal of exercise science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functionalized Quantum Dot-Based Portable Sensor for Dual Detection of Stress Biomarkers in Blood Serum and Saliva.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
- Lower Limbs Wearable Sports Garments for Muscle Recovery: An Umbrella Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the reproducibility of objective and subjective parameters of recovery pre- and post-exercise in college-aged male athletes. Thirteen male (aged 19-22y) team sport players were assessed for a range of recovery markers before and 24 hours after a repeated sprint protocol. An identical procedure was followed one week later. Participants undertook two objective tests: creatine kinase (CK) and countermovement jump (CMJ) height; and two subjective tests: visual analogue scale (VAS) for muscle soreness and 5-item well-being questionnaire (WB). Coefficients of variation (CV) of CMJ and WB were lowest of all markers studied both pre (4.0% and 5.9%) and 24 hours post (7.7% and 7.1%) exercise, respectively. The CV of a single CMJ showed the highest reproducibility pre-exercise (4.0%) compared to taking the best or average of 2 or 3 jumps. Both CK and VAS had a high CV at pre (25.6% and 49.2%) and 24 hours post (44.5% and 44.8%) exercise. Moreover, while there was no difference between the change in CMJ, WB and VAS in response to exercise between weeks, the increase in CK was greater after the first compared to second exercise bout (mean 199.6 U/L vs 10.6 U/L change,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.