Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32922573›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Pharmacist's attitudes and knowledge of pharmacogenomics and the factors that may predict future engagement.

Megan E Hundertmark, Stephen C Waring, David D Stenehjem, Dannielle A Macdonald, David J Sperl, Ann Yapel, Jacob T Brown

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An objective evaluation of fundamental pharmacogenomics knowledge among pharmacists and pharmacy students.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Megan E HundertmarkDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota. Duluth, MN (United States). olan0051@d.umn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6781-0118
Stephen C WaringDVM, PhD. Essentia Institute of Rural Health. Duluth, MN (United States). stephen.waring@essentiahealth.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9674-0083
David D StenehjemPharmD, BCOP. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota. Duluth, MN (United States). stene032@d.umn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1831-285X
Dannielle A MacdonaldPharmD, BCACP. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota. Duluth, MN (United States). danielle.macdonald@essentiahealth.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-9792
David J SperlPharmD. Essentia Health. Duluth, MN (United States). david.sperl@essentiahealth.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1209-9637
Ann YapelPharmD, BCACP. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota. Duluth, MN (United States). ann.yapel@essentiahealth.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2071-2366
Jacob T BrownPharmD, MS. Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota. Duluth, MN (United States). jtbrown@d.umn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3953-1058
University of Minnesota, Duluth · USEssentia Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile pharmacists are well positioned to implement pharmacogenomic testing in healthcare systems, uptake has been limited.

objectiveThe primary objective of this survey was to determine how post-graduate education and training influences pharmacist's knowledge and attitudes of pharmacogenomic testing.

methodsSurvey questions were developed by the study team, and responses were collected electronically using REDCap™. The electronic survey was sent to all pharmacists (n=161) within a large, multi-state healthcare system by email.

resultsA total of 75 (47%) respondents completed all aspects of the survey. The majority of respondents were female (60%), worked in acute care settings (57%), were full-time employees (80%), and worked in an urban area (85%), with many graduating in or after 2010 (43%). For post-graduate education, 36% of respondents completed a Post-Graduate Year One Residency (PGY-1), and 27% had a board certification. Those that completed a PGY-1 residency were significantly more likely to have received formal training or education on pharmacogenomics than those who had not. They also assessed their own knowledge of pharmacogenomic resources and guidelines higher than those without PGY-1 training. More recent graduates were also significantly more likely to have received formal training or education on pharmacogenomics. Additionally, pharmacists who completed a PGY-1 residency were more likely to respond favorably to pharmacogenomics being offered through pharmacy services. Pharmacists with board certification were more comfortable interpreting results of a pharmacogenomic test than those without board certification.

conclusionsPharmacists who have completed a PGY-1 residency or received board certification appear more comfortable with interpretation and implementation of pharmacogenomic testing.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitudesCertificationHealth KnowledgePharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsPharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomic TestingPracticeSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32922573
PMCPMC7470237
OpenAlexW3082374598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.