Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32922420›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2020

New Plant Breeding Techniques in Citrus for the Improvement of Important Agronomic Traits. A Review.

Fabrizio Salonia, Angelo Ciacciulli, Lara Poles, Helena Domenica Pappalardo, Stefano La Malfa, Concetta Licciardello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Intra-Specific Variation in Desiccation Tolerance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. An Improved Procedure forPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Overexpression ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabrizio SaloniaCREA - Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Acireale, Italy.
Angelo CiacciulliCREA - Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Acireale, Italy.
Lara PolesCREA - Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Acireale, Italy.
Helena Domenica PappalardoCREA - Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Acireale, Italy.
Stefano La MalfaDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Di3A), University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Concetta LicciardelloCREA - Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Acireale, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New plant breeding techniques (NPBTs) aim to overcome traditional breeding limits for fruit tree species, in order to obtain new varieties with improved organoleptic traits and resistance to biotic and abiotic stress, and to maintain fruit quality achieved over centuries by (clonal) selection. Knowledge on the gene(s) controlling a specific trait is essential for the use of NPBTs, such as genome editing and cisgenesis. In the framework of the international scientific community working on fruit tree species, including citrus, NPBTs have mainly been applied to address pathogen threats. Citrus could take advantage of NPBTs because of its complex species biology (seedlessness, apomixis, high heterozygosity, and long juvenility phase) and aptitude for

Indexed as

cisgenesisCitrusearly floweringeditingfruit qualitymarker-free vectorsregenerationtransformation

Identifiers

PMID32922420
PMCPMC7456868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.