ArticleAtmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994)2020
Statistical field calibration of a low-cost PM
Article in Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Site-Specific Calibration of Low-Cost Particulate Matter (PM) 2.5 Monitors in the United States: A Comparison of Industrial and Non-Industrial Communities.Aerosol and air quality research · 2026Article
- Equity in the Distribution of Regulatory PMEnvironmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Optimizing Air Pollution Exposure Assessment with Application to Cognitive Function.Research report (Health Effects Institute) · 2025Article
- Efficient field correction of low-cost particulate matter sensors using machine learning, mixed multiplicative/additive scaling and extended calibration inputs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Poorly quantified trends in ammonium nitrate remain critical to understand future urban aerosol control strategies.Science advances · 2025Article
- A causal machine-learning framework for studying policy impact on air pollution: a case study in COVID-19 lockdowns.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Practical Guidance for Using PurpleAir Particle Monitors for Indoor and Outdoor Measurements in Community Field Studies.Aerosol and air quality research · 2025Article
- A DYNAMIC SPATIAL FILTERING APPROACH TO MITIGATE UNDERESTIMATION BIAS IN FIELD CALIBRATED LOW-COST SENSOR AIR POLLUTION DATA.The annals of applied statistics · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Calibration Approaches for Indoor Deployments of PurpleAir Monitors.Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994) · 2023Article
- Enhancing the reliability of particulate matter sensing by multivariate Tobit model using weather and air quality data.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Characterisation and calibration of low-cost PM sensors at high temporal resolution to reference-grade performance.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Identifying optimal co-location calibration periods for low-cost sensors.Atmospheric measurement techniques · 2023Article
- Probabilistic Machine Learning with Low-Cost Sensor Networks for Occupational Exposure Assessment and Industrial Hygiene Decision Making.Annals of work exposures and health · 2022Article
- Evaluating the Performance of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Calibrate for Cross-Sensitivities in a Multipollutant Network.ACS ES&T engineering · 2022Article
- Development and Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Portable PMSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Calibration Method for Particulate Matter Low-Cost Sensors Used in Ambient Air Quality Monitoring and Research.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Stationary and portable multipollutant monitors for high-spatiotemporal-resolution air quality studies including online calibration.Atmospheric measurement techniques · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Low-cost air pollution monitors are increasingly being deployed to enrich knowledge about ambient air-pollution at high spatial and temporal resolutions. However, unlike regulatory-grade (FEM or FRM) instruments, universal quality standards for low-cost sensors are yet to be established and their data quality varies widely. This mandates thorough evaluation and calibration before any responsible use of such data. This study presents evaluation and field-calibration of the PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.