ReviewClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2020
Can Standard Health Technology Assessment Approaches Help Guide the Price of Orphan Drugs in Canada? A Review of Submissions to the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Common Drug Review.
Review in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-Effectiveness of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 1 mg versus Canagliflozin 300 mg in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a Canadian Setting.Applied health economics and health policy · 2022Trial
- Economic evaluation of multiple falls prevention interventions among community-residing older adults: we know the 'value', but what about 'value for money'?Age and ageing · 2025Article
- Prenatal Management of Spinal Muscular Atrophy in the Era of Genetic Screening and Emerging Opportunities in In Utero Therapy.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The Current State of Its Implementation in Canada.CJC open · 2024Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study of Price and Affordability of Drugs for Rare Diseases in Shandong Province, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Historical and projected public spending on drugs for rare diseases in Canada between 2010 and 2025.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Article
- Reduced fixed dose tocilizumab 400 mg IV compared to weight-based dosing in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A before-after cohort study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2022Article
- Societal preferences for funding orphan drugs in China: An application of the discrete choice experiment method.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- Screening and Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Wildfire Evacuees: A Cost-Utility Analysis.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orphan drugs have high acquisition costs and when standard health technology assessment (HTA) approaches are used to assess their cost-effectiveness, they often appear not cost-effective. The Canadian Patented Medicine Review Board (PMPRB), through new regulations, will apply HTA assessment results from the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) and Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS) when setting the maximum price that can be charged for Category I patented medicines (treatments with an annual cost exceeding 150% of GDP per capita of Canada or with expected annual market size >$50M). Through these regulations, PMPRB has also established a willingness-to-pay threshold of CAD$200,000 or CAD$150,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) for medications with a prevalence of no more than 1 in 2000 across all approved indications. We reviewed the orphan drug submissions made to CADTH's Common Drug Review (CDR) January 2015-May 2020 to understand how the methodology of assessing cost-effectiveness of orphan drugs has guided pricing in Canada. A total of 35 orphan drug submissions were assessed by CDR in this period, none of which met the willingness-to-pay threshold of CAD$50,000 per QALY. Only one drug met the CAD$200,000 per QALY for Therapeutic Criteria Level I, and two drugs met CAD$150,000 per QALY for other Therapeutic Criteria Levels proposed by PMPRB. Price reductions of 32-99% were recommended for treatments that were approved in order to be listed for reimbursement. This review showed that the new PMPRB regulations could be creating challenges for manufacturers of rare disease treatments to meet Canadian pricing regulations. These regulations may jeopardize the launch of new medicines and limit opportunities to add to the development of real-world evidence of orphan drugs, which can be used in reimbursement approaches such as pay-for-performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.