Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32921868›Full record

ArticleFunctional ecology2020

The untapped potential of reptile biodiversity for understanding how and why animals age.

Luke A Hoekstra, Tonia S Schwartz, Amanda M Sparkman, David A W Miller, Anne M Bronikowski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Functional ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Postnatal expression ofProceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Thermal conditions predict intraspecific variation in senescence rate in frogs and toads.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luke A HoekstraDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50010, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6122-8100
Tonia S SchwartzDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA.
Amanda M SparkmanDepartment of Biology, Westmont College, Santa Barbara, California, 93108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3504-6426
David A W MillerDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3011-3677
Anne M BronikowskiDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50010, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6432-298X
Iowa State University · USAuburn University · USPennsylvania State University · USWestmont College · US

Funding

Biodemography and senescence in long-lived painted turtlesR01AG049416 · NIA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BRONIKOWSKI, ANNE · 2015 to 2019
$1.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The field of comparative aging biology has greatly expanded in the past 20 years. Longitudinal studies of populations of reptiles with a range of maximum lifespans have accumulated and been analyzed for evidence of mortality senescence and reproductive decline. While not as well represented in studies of amniote senescence, reptiles have been the subjects of many recent demographic and mechanistic studies of the biology of aging. 2. We review recent literature on reptile demographic senescence, mechanisms of senescence, and identify unanswered questions. Given the ecophysiological and demographic diversity of reptiles, what is the expected range of reptile senescence rates? Are known mechanisms of aging in reptiles consistent with canonical hallmarks of aging in model systems? What are the knowledge gaps in our understanding of reptile aging? 3. We find ample evidence of increasing mortality with advancing age in many reptiles. Testudines stand out as slower aging than other orders, but data on crocodilians and tuatara are sparse. Sex-specific analyses are generally not available. Studies of female reproduction suggest that reptiles are less likely to have reproductive decline with advancing age than mammals. 4. Reptiles share many physiological and molecular pathways of aging with mammals, birds, and laboratory model organisms. Adaptations related to stress physiology coupled with reptilian ectothermy suggest novel comparisons and contrasts that can be made with canonical aging phenotypes in mammals. These include stem cell and regeneration biology, homeostatic mechanisms, IIS/TOR signaling, and DNA repair. 5. To overcome challenges to the study of reptile aging, we recommend extending and expanding long-term monitoring of reptile populations, developing reptile cell lines to aid cellular biology, conducting more comparative studies of reptile morphology and physiology sampled along relevant life-history axes, and sequencing more reptile genomes for comparative genomics. Given the diversity of reptile life histories and adaptations, achieving these directives will likely greatly benefit all aging biology.

Indexed as

demographyectothermlife historyphysiologysenescencevertebrate

Identifiers

PMID32921868
PMCPMC7480806
OpenAlexW2972764040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.