Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32921515›Full record

Observational studyNeurologia

COVID-19 and the forgotten pandemic: follow-up of neurocognitive disorders during lockdown in Argentina.

M Sorbara, H G Graviotto, G M Lage-Ruiz, C M Turizo-Rodriguez, L A Sotelo-López, A Serra, C Gagliardi, G Heinemann, P Martinez, F Ces-Magliano and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M SorbaraNeurología Cognitiva y Neuropsicología, Hospital Dr. César Milstein, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: neurologia.milstein@gmail.com.
H G GraviottoNeurología Cognitiva y Neuropsicología, Hospital Dr. César Milstein, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Asociación de Lucha contra el Mal de Alzheimer y alteraciones semejantes de la República Argentina (ALMA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
G M Lage-RuizNeurología Cognitiva y Neuropsicología, Hospital Dr. César Milstein, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
C M Turizo-RodriguezNeurología Cognitiva y Neuropsicología, Hospital Dr. César Milstein, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
L A Sotelo-LópezNeurología Cognitiva y Neuropsicología, Hospital Dr. César Milstein, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
A SerraNeurología Cognitiva y Neuropsicología, Hospital Dr. César Milstein, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
C GagliardiNeurología Cognitiva y Neuropsicología, Hospital Dr. César Milstein, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
G HeinemannNeurología Cognitiva y Neuropsicología, Hospital Dr. César Milstein, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
P MartinezNeurología Cognitiva y Neuropsicología, Hospital Dr. César Milstein, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
F Ces-MaglianoNeurología Cognitiva y Neuropsicología, Hospital Dr. César Milstein, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
C M SerranoNeurología Cognitiva y Neuropsicología, Hospital Dr. César Milstein, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Carrera de Investigador en Salud Clínica del Gobierno de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Asociación de Lucha contra el Mal de Alzheimer y alteraciones semejantes de la República Argentina (ALMA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth systems in numerous countries around the world are suffering a serious burden as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of this situation, the follow-up of such chronic diseases as dementia may be at risk. Similarly, neuropsychiatric complications related to lockdown measures may also be neglected; Argentina's lockdown has been the longest implemented in Latin America. This study aims to determine the frequency of the different types of medical consultations for neurocognitive disorders and the predictors for requiring consultation since the beginning of the lockdown.

methodsWe performed a descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study based on data collected through an online survey.

resultsData were collected on 324 participants, with 165 (50.9%) having had at least one medical consultation. Consultations were held by telephone in 109 cases (33.6%), by e-mail in 62 (19.1%), by video conference in 30 (9.3%), and at the emergency department in 23 (7.1%). Predictors of requiring consultation were Clinical Dementia Rating scores ≥1 (P<.001) and diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (P=.017). Higher Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores were found in the group of respondents who did require medical consultation (P<.001), but no significant differences were found between groups for Zarit Burden Interview scores.

conclusionWe identified a high prevalence of behavioural disorders and caregiver burden during lockdown. Nevertheless, only 50% of respondents had sought medical consultation (by telephone or email in 52.7% of cases). Care of people with dementia must be emphasised, guaranteeing follow-up of these patients.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareReferral and ConsultationAgedAlzheimer DiseaseArgentinaCaregiver BurdenCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedNeurocognitive DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesCaregiver burdenCOVID-19DemenciaDementiaNeuropsychiatric symptomsPandemiaPandemicPublic healthSalud públicaSíntomas neuropsiquiátricosSobrecarga al cuidador

Identifiers

PMID32921515
PMCPMC7396892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.