Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32921513›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2021

Single- and Multifraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose/Volume Tolerances of the Brain.

Michael T Milano, Jimm Grimm, Andrzej Niemierko, Scott G Soltys, Vitali Moiseenko, Kristin J Redmond, Ellen Yorke, Arjun Sahgal, Jinyu Xue, Anand Mahadevan and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07415668 (Motor Eloquent Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Radiosurgery Planning), which is not on this map. Cited by 219 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
219citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
22.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07415668 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Motor Eloquent Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Radiosurgery Planning

TypeinterventionalSponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRan2026 to 2029Enrolled30ConditionsMetastases to BrainArmsNavigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nTMS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

219 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 369 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Reirradiation of recurrent brain tumors: a review by the ESTRO CNS Focus Group.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stereotactic radiotherapy in brain metastases: SRS/FSRT paradox and preferences of radiation oncologists in Türkiye (TROD 10-010 study).Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Incidence of radiation necrosis following different radiotherapy fractionation schedules for intracranial meningiomas.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article

159 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael T MilanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. Electronic address: michael_milano@urmc.rochester.edu.
Jimm GrimmDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Andrzej NiemierkoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Scott G SoltysDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
Vitali MoiseenkoDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Kristin J RedmondDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ellen YorkeDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York.
Arjun SahgalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jinyu XueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York City, NY.
Anand MahadevanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Geisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Alexander MuacevicEuropean Cyberknife Center Munich-Großhadern, Munich, Germany.
Lawrence B MarksDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Lawrence R KleinbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Geisinger Neuroscience Institute · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNYU Langone Health · USStanford Medicine · USSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs part of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy investigating normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) after hypofractionated radiation therapy, data from published reports (PubMed indexed 1995-2018) were pooled to identify dosimetric and clinical predictors of radiation-induced brain toxicity after single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible studies provided NTCPs for the endpoints of radionecrosis, edema, or symptoms after cranial SRS/fSRS and quantitative dose-volume metrics. Studies of patients with only glioma, meningioma, vestibular schwannoma, or brainstem targets were excluded. The data summary and analyses focused on arteriovenous malformations (AVM) and brain metastases.

resultsData from 51 reports are summarized. There was wide variability in reported rates of radionecrosis. Available data for SRS/fSRS for brain metastases were more amenable to NTCP modeling than AVM data. In the setting of brain metastases, SRS/fSRS-associated radionecrosis can be difficult to differentiate from tumor progression. For single-fraction SRS to brain metastases, tissue volumes (including target volumes) receiving 12 Gy (V12) of 5 cm

conclusionsThe risk of radionecrosis after SRS and fSRS can be modeled as a function of dose and volume treated. The use of fSRS appears to reduce risks of radionecrosis for larger treatment volumes relative to SRS. More standardized dosimetric and toxicity reporting is needed to facilitate future pooled analyses that can refine predictive models of brain toxicity risks.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBrainBrain EdemaBrain NeoplasmsBrain StemDisease ProgressionHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalNecrosisOrgans at RiskProbabilityRadiation Dose HypofractionationRadiation InjuriesAntineoplastic AgentsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID32921513
PMCPMC9387178
OpenAlexW3085200879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.