Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32921445›Full record

ArticleChild abuse & neglect2020

Rapid return of children in residential care to family as a result of COVID-19: Scope, challenges, and recommendations.

Nicole Gilbertson Wilke, Amanda Hiles Howard, Philip Goldman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child abuse & neglect, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Group Homes and COVID-19: Perspectives of Youth Residents, Staff, and Caregivers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Violence against children during the COVID-19 pandemic.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. What Happened to the Prevention of Child Maltreatment During COVID-19? A Yearlong into the Pandemic Reflection.International journal on child maltreatment : research, policy and practice · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole Gilbertson WilkeChristian Alliance for Orphans, 505 Los Arces Monteflor II Cayma, Arequipa, Peru. Electronic address: nicole@CAFO.org.
Amanda Hiles HowardSamford University, 800 Lakeshore Dr. Homewood, AL 35229, USA. Electronic address: ahoward6@samford.edu.
Philip GoldmanMaestral International, Suite 2850, 150 South Fifth Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402, USA. Electronic address: pgoldman@maestral.orgs.
Samford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, some governments have mandated that residential care providers rapidly return children and youth to family.

objectiveThe goal of the present study was to better understand the scope and characteristics of rapid return, and to provide data-informed recommendations for service providers working with this population. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingRepresentatives from 67 non-government organizations (NGOs) providing residential care that were government-mandated to rapidly return children and youth to family completed a brief online survey. They collectively serve 12,494 children in 14 nations.

methodsUsing a mixed methods design, results examined 1) characteristics of the rapid return mandate, 2) preparation received by children and families, 3) support services provided since the return, and 4) primary concerns for children and families.

resultsData revealed that rapid return was characterized by compressed timelines that did not allow for adequate child and family assessment and preparation. However, all respondents indicated they believed at least some families would be able to remain intact safely with appropriate support. Primary concerns for children and families related to unresolved antecedents to separation, lack of economic capacity, limited monitoring, and lack of access to education.

conclusionsBased on the findings, 9 recommendations were made for service providers working with children and families that have been rapidly reunified as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19DeinstitutionalizationFamilyGovernment RegulationResidential FacilitiesAdolescentChildHumansInternationalityMalePandemicsChild welfareCOVID-19NGOsRapid returnVulnerable children and families

Identifiers

PMID32921445
PMCPMC7473257
OpenAlexW3083421591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.