Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32921315›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

The ranging of amino acids substitution matrices of various types in accordance with the alignment accuracy criterion.

Valery Polyanovsky, Alexander Lifanov, Natalia Esipova, Vladimir Tumanyan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bioinformatics research at SBB-2019.BMC bioinformatics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Valery PolyanovskyEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova 32, 119991, Moscow, Russia. polyanovskyvo@yandex.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6469-8223
Alexander LifanovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova 32, 119991, Moscow, Russia.
Natalia EsipovaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova 32, 119991, Moscow, Russia.
Vladimir TumanyanEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova 32, 119991, Moscow, Russia. tuman@eimb.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe alignment of character sequences is important in bioinformatics. The quality of this procedure is determined by the substitution matrix and parameters of the insertion-deletion penalty function. These matrices are derived from sequence alignment and thus reflect the evolutionary process. Currently, in addition to evolutionary matrices, a large number of different background matrices have been obtained. To make an optimal choice of the substitution matrix and the penalty parameters, we conducted a numerical experiment using a representative sample of existing matrices of various types and origins.

resultsWe tested both the classical evolutionary matrix series (PAM, Blosum, VTML, Pfasum); structural alignment based matrices, contact energy matrix, and matrix based on the properties of the genetic code. This study presents results for two test set types: first, we simulated sequences that reflect the divergent evolution; second, we performed tests on Balibase sequences. In both cases, we obtained the dependences of the alignment quality (Accuracy, Confidence) on the evolutionary distance between sequences and the evolutionary distance to which the substitution matrices correspond. Optimization of a combination of matrices and the penalty parameters was carried out for local and global alignment on the values of penalty function parameters. Consequently, we found that the best alignment quality is achieved with matrices corresponding to the largest evolutionary distance. These matrices prove to be universal, i.e. suitable for aligning sequences separated by both large and small evolutionary distances. We analysed the correspondence of the correlation coefficients of matrices to the alignment quality. It was found that matrices showing high quality alignment have an above average correlation value, but the converse is not true.

conclusionsThis study showed that the best alignment quality is achieved with evolutionary matrices designed for long distances: Gonnet, VTML250, PAM250, MIQS, and Pfasum050. The same property is inherent in matrices not only of evolutionary origin, but also of another background corresponding to a large evolutionary distance. Therefore, matrices based on structural data show alignment quality close enough to its value for evolutionary matrices. This agrees with the idea that the spatial structure is more conservative than the protein sequence.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionSequence AlignmentSoftwareAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinProteinsDivergent evolutionEvolutionary distancePenalcty functionSequence alignmentSubstitution matrix

Identifiers

PMID32921315
PMCPMC7489204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.