Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32920952›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2021

Comparison of antifungal and cytotoxicity activities of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles with amphotericin B against different Candida species: In vitro evaluation.

Shima Ahmadpour Kermani, Samira Salari, Pooya Ghasemi Nejad Almani

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Zinc oxide nanoparticles againstFrontiers in antibiotics · 2026
    Review
  4. Antifungal effect of titanium oxide nanoparticles onFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. TiOFood science & nutrition · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Screening, characterisation and bioactivities of green fabricated TiOEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shima Ahmadpour KermaniClinic laboratory, Social Security Organization, Baft, Kerman, Iran.
Samira SalariMedical Mycology and Bacteriology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7241-5246
Pooya Ghasemi Nejad AlmaniLeishmaniasis Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-1034
Kerman University of Medical Sciences · IRSocial Security Office (Thailand) · TH

Funding

Deputy of Research and Technology of Kerman University of Medical Sciences 97000658
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCandida species are known to cause serious fungal infections that produce cutaneous, mucosal, and systemic infections. Nowadays, mortality and morbidity candidiasis in immunocompromised patients have increased. Nanotechnology is a new world-known technology and includes particles ranging from about 1 to 100 nanometers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antifungal and cytotoxicity activities of titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2-NPs) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) compared to amphotericin B (AmB) on different Candida spp in in vitro conditions.

methodsIn the present study, susceptibility of different Candida species to TiO2-NPs and ZnO-NPs compared to AmB was determined by broth microdilution (BMD) and agar well diffusion methods. Cytotoxicity of TiO2-NPs and ZnO-NPs and amphotericin B was measured by MTT (3-(4, 5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide) assay.

resultsThe results indicated that the TiO2-NPs and ZnO-NPs showed antifungal activities against pathogenic Candida spp. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of TiO2-NP ranges against Candida spp. were 128-256 µg/mL and 256-512 µg/mL, respectively. The MIC and MFC values of ZnO-NPs were 64-128 µg/mL and 256-512 µg/mL, respectively. However, MICs and MFCs of AmB were 8-16 µg/mL and 16-32 µg/mL, respectively. The MTT assay results showed that the CC50% belonged to ZnO-NPs 706.2 μg/mL, for TiO2-NPs 862.1 μg/mL, and for AmB 70.19 μg/mL, respectively.

conclusionOur findings showed that TiO2-NPs and ZnO-NPs had antifungal effects against all Candida species, yet the antifungal properties of TiO2-NPs and ZnO-NPs were significantly less than those of AmB. The CC50% of AmB was significantly lower than ZnO-NPs and TiO2-NPs.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAntifungal AgentsTitaniumZinc OxideAnimalsCandidaCell LineCell SurvivalMetal NanoparticlesMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTetrazolium SaltsThiazolesAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsTetrazolium SaltsThiazolesthiazolyl blueTitaniumtitanium dioxideZinc Oxideamphotericin BCandida sppMTTtitanium dioxide nanoparticleszinc oxide nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID32920952
PMCPMC7843264
OpenAlexW3085955809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.