Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32920720›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Impact of Borderline Resectability in Pancreatic Head Cancer on Patient Survival: Biology Matters According to the New International Consensus Criteria.

Friedrich Anger, Anna Döring, Jacob van Dam, Johan Friso Lock, Ingo Klein, Max Bittrich, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Armin Wiegering, Volker Kunzmann, Casper van Eijck and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Digestive cancers: mechanisms, therapeutics and management.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Clinical Implications of FDG-PET in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Friedrich AngerDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, Julius Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Anna DöringDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, Julius Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Jacob van DamDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan Friso LockDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, Julius Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Ingo KleinDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, Julius Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Max BittrichDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Julius Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Christoph-Thomas GermerDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, Julius Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Armin WiegeringDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, Julius Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Volker KunzmannDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Julius Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Casper van Eijck *Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stefan Löb *Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Paediatric Surgery, Julius Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Würzburg, Germany. loeb_s@ukw.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5002-0470

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternational consensus criteria (ICC) have redefined borderline resectability for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) according to three dimensions: anatomical (BR-A), biological (BR-B), and conditional (BR-C). The present definition acknowledges that resectability is not just about the anatomic relationship between the tumour and vessels but that biological and conditional dimensions also are important.

methodsPatients' tumours were retrospectively defined borderline resectable according to ICC. The study cohort was grouped into either BR-A or BR-B and compared with patients considered primarily resectable (R). Differences in postoperative complications, pathological reports, overall (OS), and disease-free survival were assessed.

resultsA total of 345 patients underwent resection for PDAC. By applying ICC in routine preoperative assessment, 30 patients were classified as stage BR-A and 62 patients as stage BR-B. In total, 253 patients were considered R. The cohort did not contain BR-C patients. No differences in postoperative complications were detected. Median OS was significantly shorter in BR-A (15 months) and BR-B (12 months) compared with R (20 months) patients (BR-A vs. R: p = 0.09 and BR-B vs. R: p < 0.001). CA19-9, as the determining factor of BR-B patients, turned out to be an independent prognostic risk factor for OS.

conclusionsPreoperative staging defining surgical resectability in PDAC according to ICC is crucial for patient survival. Patients with PDAC BR-B should be considered for multimodal neoadjuvant therapy even if considered anatomically resectable.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsBiologyConsensusHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID32920720
PMCPMC7940298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.