Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32920710›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2021

The pediatric accessory sacroiliac joint: does it exist?

Allison Rixey, Naveen Murthy, Kimberly Amrami, Matthew Frick, Gavin McKenzie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Canine Sacroiliac Joint: 2. Common Surface Variants.Anatomia, histologia, embryologia · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allison RixeyMayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Naveen MurthyMayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Kimberly AmramiMayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Matthew FrickMayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Gavin McKenzieMayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. mckenzie.gavin@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1544-6155
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDetermine the prevalence of the accessory sacroiliac joint in the pediatric population and describe variant sacroiliac joint morphology that may predispose patients to the development of an accessory sacroiliac joint. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne hundred and seventy-eight high-resolution pelvic CT scans of patients aged 0 to 15 years were reviewed for the presence of an accessory sacroiliac joint. Patients were stratified based on age and gender. Morphology of the sacroiliac joints was detailed to assess the degree of curvature in the expected characteristic location of the accessory sacroiliac joint.

resultsNo accessory sacroiliac joint was identified on any of the pediatric pelvic CT scans. The sacroiliac joints demonstrated varying degrees of unilateral or bilateral curvature in the expected region of the accessory sacroiliac joint which increased in both severity and prevalence with age.

conclusionThe pediatric accessory sacroiliac joint may not exist and is unlikely to be a congenital variant present at birth. However, curvature of the sacroiliac joint in the expected location of the accessory sacroiliac joint which increases in severity and prevalence with age may predispose patients to the formation of an accessory sacroiliac joint later in life.

Indexed as

Sacroiliac JointTomography, X-Ray ComputedChildHumansInfant, NewbornPelvisAccessory sacroiliac jointCTPediatric sacroiliac joint

Identifiers

PMID32920710
OpenAlexW3086579924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.