Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32920663›Full record

ReviewMicrobial ecology2021

Dispersal of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi: Evidence and Insights for Ecological Studies.

Claudia Paz, Maarja Öpik, Leticia Bulascoschi, C Guillermo Bueno, Mauro Galetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Climate-linked biogeography of mycorrhizal fungal spore traits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudia PazDepartment of Ecology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University, Av 24A 1515, Rio Claro, SP, 13506-900, Brazil. claudiappaz@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-4087
Maarja ÖpikDepartment of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40 Street, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8025-7460
Leticia BulascoschiDepartment of Ecology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University, Av 24A 1515, Rio Claro, SP, 13506-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9022-5910
C Guillermo BuenoDepartment of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40 Street, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7288-2271
Mauro GalettiDepartment of Ecology, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University, Av 24A 1515, Rio Claro, SP, 13506-900, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8187-8696

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/00212-1Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/16697-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dispersal is a critical ecological process that modulates gene flow and contributes to the maintenance of genetic and taxonomic diversity within ecosystems. Despite an increasing global understanding of the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal diversity, distribution and prevalence in different biomes, we have largely ignored the main dispersal mechanisms of these organisms. To provide a geographical and scientific overview of the available data, we systematically searched for the direct evidence on the AM fungal dispersal agents (abiotic and biotic) and different propagule types (i.e. spores, extraradical hyphae or colonized root fragments). We show that the available data (37 articles) on AM fungal dispersal originates mostly from North America, from temperate ecosystems, from biotic dispersal agents (small mammals) and AM fungal spores as propagule type. Much lesser evidence exists from South American, Asian and African tropical systems and other dispersers such as large-bodied birds and mammals and non-spore propagule types. We did not find strong evidence that spore size varies across dispersal agents, but wind and large animals seem to be more efficient dispersers. However, the data is still too scarce to draw firm conclusions from this finding. We further discuss and propose critical research questions and potential approaches to advance the understanding of the ecology of AM fungi dispersal.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiotaEnvironmentGeographyHyphaeMycorrhizaePlant RootsSpores, FungalAbiotic dispersalBiotic dispersalGlomeromycotinaMycophagyPropagule

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.