Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32920603›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2021

Urban-regional patterns of food purchasing behaviour: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2015-2016 Australian Household Expenditure Survey.

Fiona Dangerfield, Karen E Lamb, Laura H Oostenbach, Kylie Ball, Lukar E Thornton

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Planning healthy food environments: An analysis of local government municipal public health and wellbeing policy in regional Victoria.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Effectiveness of Foodbank Western Australia'sInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fiona DangerfieldInstitute of Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Melbourne, Victoria, 3125, Australia. fdangerfield@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5105-2981
Karen E LambInstitute of Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Melbourne, Victoria, 3125, Australia.
Laura H OostenbachInstitute of Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Melbourne, Victoria, 3125, Australia.
Kylie BallInstitute of Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Melbourne, Victoria, 3125, Australia.
Lukar E ThorntonInstitute of Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Melbourne, Victoria, 3125, Australia.

Funding

Deakin University Faculty of Health Postgraduate Research Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesIn many high-income countries people living in regional (rural) areas have higher rates of chronic disease compared to people living in urban areas. Food purchasing behaviour provides a potential pathway linking residential location with dietary intake and health outcomes. This study examined the relationship between geographic location and food expenditure on a range of foods. SUBJECTS/

methodsData from the 2015-2016 Australian Household Expenditure Survey (number of households = 9827) were used to examine weekly household food expenditure and proportion of total food expenditure on 14 categories of food items. Foods were classified using the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating. Two-part models and zero-one inflated beta regression models were used to assess the association between geographic area and food expenditure.

resultsAverage proportion of total food expenditure on fruit was estimated to be more for households located in major cities compared to households located in inner and outer regional areas. Households located in inner and outer regional areas allocated less to fresh fruit, fish and meals out compared to households in major cities. Households located in inner regional areas allocated a greater proportion of their food budget to sweet cakes, biscuits, puddings, desserts, chocolate and ice-cream compared to households in major cities and outer regional areas.

conclusionsThe geographic patterns in food purchasing suggest those in regional areas may be at risk of diets less aligned with healthy guidelines. Given the findings of this study suggesting geographic differences in food purchasing, further research is warranted to enhance contextual understanding of food purchasing behaviours in regional areas.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsHealth ExpendituresAnimalsAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFruitHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.