ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2021
Dramatic improvement of bullous pemphigoid with omalizumab in an elderly patient.
Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rituximab, Omalizumab, and Dupilumab Treatment Outcomes in Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- Article
- Omalizumab and Dupilumab for the Treatment of Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The cytokine milieu of bullous pemphigoid: Current and novel therapeutic targets.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Rapid Disease Control in First-Line Therapy-Resistant Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid and Bullous Pemphigoid with Omalizumab as Add-On Therapy: A Case Series Of 13 Patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Emerging Biomarkers and Therapeutic Strategies for Refractory Bullous Pemphigoid.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 70-year-old man with a history of hypertension was evaluated in our dermatology department due to the appearance of a clinical picture compatible with bullous pemphigoid that was confirmed histologically. The lack of response to topical and systemic immunosuppressive treatment resulted in omalizumab being prescribed in a multidisciplinary committee based on the clinical and analytical findings and the patient's refusal to be treated with rituximab. The evaluation at 3 months showed the absence of blisters on the clinical examination. No associated adverse effects were observed. In the following 3 months the patient was administered medication at home in the absence of an anaphylactic reaction and with prior training by the nursing staff of the Hospital Pharmacy Service. After 6 months the medication was suspended with no relapses for 6 months since the last dose. Omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal drug which has a good safety profile with minimum adverse side effects should be considered when there is a contraindication to the use of intravenous therapies (eg, immunoglobulins, rituximab) or prolonged immunosuppressive treatment (eg, methotrexate, azathioprine).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.